VIVAX vs. PNGAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX).
VIVAX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on Nov 2, 1992. PNGAX is managed by Putnam. It was launched on Jul 31, 1996.
Performance
VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIVAX Vanguard Value Index Fund | 1.61% | 14.50% | 15.85% | 9.08% | -2.18% | 26.32% | 2.18% | 25.66% | -5.56% | 16.98% |
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund | -0.06% | 34.66% | 5.86% | 18.50% | -6.85% | 14.24% | 4.19% | 19.96% | -18.02% | 24.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIVAX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly higher than PNGAX's -0.06% return. Over the past 10 years, VIVAX has outperformed PNGAX with an annualized return of 11.42%, while PNGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.09% annualized return.
VIVAX
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -6.37%
- YTD
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 4.57%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- 14.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.42%
PNGAX
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -9.31%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 3.35%
- 1Y
- 20.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.27%
- 5Y*
- 10.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIVAX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than PNGAX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
VIVAX vs. PNGAX — Risk / Return Rank
VIVAX
PNGAX
VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIVAX | PNGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 1.22 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 1.64 | -0.15 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | 1.60 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.60 | 6.30 | -0.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIVAX | PNGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 1.22 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 | 0.68 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.54 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.34 | +0.20 |
Correlation
The correlation between VIVAX and PNGAX is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Dividend Comparison
VIVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, less than PNGAX's 2.97% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIVAX Vanguard Value Index Fund | 1.93% | 1.42% | 2.19% | 2.33% | 2.39% | 2.02% | 2.43% | 2.39% | 2.59% | 2.18% | 2.33% | 2.46% |
PNGAX Putnam International Value Fund | 2.97% | 2.97% | 3.89% | 2.35% | 1.63% | 5.70% | 1.84% | 3.91% | 4.34% | 1.11% | 2.23% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIVAX drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, smaller than the maximum PNGAX drawdown of -64.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIVAX and PNGAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIVAX | PNGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.38% | -64.78% | +5.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.28% | -11.13% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.17% | -27.37% | +10.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.81% | -41.58% | +4.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.37% | -9.35% | +2.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.11% | -15.89% | +7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 2.98% | -0.49% |
Volatility
VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) is 3.27%, while Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that VIVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| VIVAX | PNGAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.27% | 6.84% | -3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.54% | 10.40% | -2.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 16.32% | -1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.91% | 15.62% | -1.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 17.02% | -0.28% |