PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIVAX vs. PNGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIVAX achieves a 12.20% return, which is significantly higher than PNGAX's 9.56% return. Over the past 10 years, VIVAX has outperformed PNGAX with an annualized return of 12.27%, while PNGAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.82% annualized return.


VIVAX

1D
0.86%
1M
4.21%
YTD
12.20%
6M
13.03%
1Y
26.06%
3Y*
17.88%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
12.27%

PNGAX

1D
0.80%
1M
3.00%
YTD
9.56%
6M
12.44%
1Y
22.48%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
10.95%
10Y*
9.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIVAX
Vanguard Value Index Fund
12.20%14.50%15.85%9.08%-2.18%26.32%2.18%25.66%-5.56%16.98%
PNGAX
Putnam International Value Fund
9.56%34.66%5.86%18.50%-6.85%14.24%4.19%19.96%-18.02%24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between VIVAX and PNGAX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 1996

0.67

The correlation between VIVAX and PNGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIVAX vs. PNGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIVAX
VIVAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VIVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
VIVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PNGAX
PNGAX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PNGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PNGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIVAXPNGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.28

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.21

2.10

+2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.84

7.74

+8.09

VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIVAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.66, which is higher than the PNGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIVAX and PNGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIVAXPNGAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66

1.55

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

0.70

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.58

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.35

+0.20

Drawdowns

VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIVAX drawdown since its inception was -59.38%, smaller than the maximum PNGAX drawdown of -64.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIVAX and PNGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIVAXPNGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.38%

-64.78%

+5.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.37%

-10.51%

+4.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.90%

-13.87%

-1.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.17%

-27.37%

+10.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.81%

-41.58%

+4.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.63%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.07%

-15.82%

+7.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

2.84%

-1.15%

Volatility

VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Value Index Fund (VIVAX) is 2.71%, while Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) has a volatility of 4.18%. This indicates that VIVAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIVAXPNGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

4.18%

-1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

11.41%

-3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.09%

14.28%

-4.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.92%

15.75%

-1.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.74%

17.06%

-0.32%

VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIVAX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than PNGAX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

VIVAX vs. PNGAX - Dividend Comparison

VIVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, less than PNGAX's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PNGAX
Putnam International Value Fund
2.71%2.97%3.89%2.35%1.63%5.70%1.84%3.91%4.34%1.11%2.23%1.09%
VIVAX
Vanguard Value Index Fund
1.75%1.42%2.19%2.33%2.39%2.02%2.43%2.39%2.59%2.18%2.33%2.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIVAX and PNGAX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNGAX has higher volatility (4.18%) compared to VIVAX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIVAX dropped -59.38% vs PNGAX's -64.78%.

VIVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIVAX and PNGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer