PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VITSX vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VITSX vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITSX achieves a 9.11% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.55% return.


VITSX

1D
1.88%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
9.11%
6M
9.18%
1Y
25.69%
3Y*
20.73%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
14.94%

CGDV

1D
0.66%
1M
0.35%
YTD
11.55%
6M
12.50%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
24.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITSX vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
9.11%17.14%23.25%26.51%-8.65%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
11.55%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VITSX and CGDV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.93

The correlation between VITSX and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

VITSX vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VITSX
CGDV

Technology

33.3%
34.1%

Financial Services

11.9%
6.8%

Communication Services

10.1%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%
10.6%

Industrials

9.5%
13.2%

Healthcare

9.1%
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
5.5%

Energy

3.8%
3.8%

Utilities

2.7%
2.1%

Real Estate

2.4%
1.1%

Basic Materials

2.0%
2.9%

Technology

VITSX
33.3%
CGDV
34.1%

Financial Services

VITSX
11.9%
CGDV
6.8%

Communication Services

VITSX
10.1%
CGDV
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VITSX
9.8%
CGDV
10.6%

Industrials

VITSX
9.5%
CGDV
13.2%

Healthcare

VITSX
9.1%
CGDV
11.5%

Consumer Defensive

VITSX
4.7%
CGDV
5.5%

Energy

VITSX
3.8%
CGDV
3.8%

Utilities

VITSX
2.7%
CGDV
2.1%

Real Estate

VITSX
2.4%
CGDV
1.1%

Basic Materials

VITSX
2.0%
CGDV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VITSX vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITSX
VITSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VITSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VITSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITSX vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VITSXCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.77

2.83

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.46

13.19

-0.72

VITSX vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITSX and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VITSX vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITSX drawdown since its inception was -55.30%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITSX and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VITSXCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.30%

-21.82%

-33.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-9.75%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.36%

-14.28%

-5.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.56%

-0.98%

-1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-3.60%

-6.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

2.09%

-0.11%

Volatility

VITSX vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares (VITSX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) have volatilities of 4.60% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VITSXCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.60%

4.52%

+0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.93%

9.80%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.72%

12.13%

+0.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

15.57%

+1.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.44%

15.57%

+2.87%

VITSX vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VITSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

VITSX vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

VITSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, less than CGDV's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.17%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VITSX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.03%1.12%1.27%1.43%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.77%2.04%1.71%1.93%1.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, VITSX and CGDV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VITSX has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to CGDV (4.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITSX dropped -55.30% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VITSX and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer