PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VITPX vs. WFIVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VITPX vs. WFIVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) and Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VITPX having a 11.99% return and WFIVX slightly lower at 11.56%. Over the past 10 years, VITPX has outperformed WFIVX with an annualized return of 15.19%, while WFIVX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.07% annualized return.


VITPX

1D
0.24%
1M
5.76%
YTD
11.99%
6M
11.89%
1Y
29.15%
3Y*
22.92%
5Y*
13.38%
10Y*
15.19%

WFIVX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.61%
YTD
11.56%
6M
11.35%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
21.40%
5Y*
12.57%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VITPX vs. WFIVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.99%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-5.59%20.51%
WFIVX
Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio
11.56%16.31%22.59%24.97%-18.97%25.51%19.90%29.74%-5.66%20.29%

Correlation

The correlation between VITPX and WFIVX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2001

1.00

The correlation between VITPX and WFIVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VITPX vs. WFIVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

WFIVX
WFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
WFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VITPX vs. WFIVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) and Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VITPXWFIVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.43

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

3.26

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.60

14.97

+0.62

VITPX vs. WFIVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the WFIVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITPX and WFIVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VITPXWFIVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.40

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.74

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.78

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.40

+0.10

Drawdowns

VITPX vs. WFIVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITPX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, roughly equal to the maximum WFIVX drawdown of -55.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITPX and WFIVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VITPXWFIVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-55.43%

+0.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-8.89%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-19.36%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

-24.93%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.99%

-34.62%

-0.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.02%

-11.64%

+3.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

1.93%

0.00%

Volatility

VITPX vs. WFIVX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) and Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX) have volatilities of 2.94% and 2.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VITPXWFIVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

2.89%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.19%

9.12%

+0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

12.10%

+0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

17.13%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

18.19%

+0.22%

VITPX vs. WFIVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VITPX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than WFIVX's 0.54% expense ratio.


Dividends

VITPX vs. WFIVX - Dividend Comparison

VITPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, less than WFIVX's 8.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.24%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%
WFIVX
Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio
8.04%8.97%2.79%3.33%5.18%7.25%9.16%5.06%5.97%8.83%2.06%1.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, VITPX and WFIVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VITPX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to WFIVX (2.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITPX dropped -55.28% vs WFIVX's -55.43%.

VITPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VITPX and WFIVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer