PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WFIVX vs. ^NDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WFIVX vs. ^NDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WFIVX vs. ^NDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WFIVX
Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio
-6.78%16.31%22.59%24.97%-18.97%25.51%19.90%29.74%-5.66%20.29%
^NDX
NASDAQ 100 Index
-5.98%20.17%24.88%53.81%-32.97%26.63%47.58%37.96%-1.04%31.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WFIVX achieves a -6.78% return, which is significantly lower than ^NDX's -5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, WFIVX has underperformed ^NDX with an annualized return of 12.25%, while ^NDX has yielded a comparatively higher 18.01% annualized return.


WFIVX

1D
-0.46%
1M
-7.73%
YTD
-6.78%
6M
-4.76%
1Y
14.04%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
9.72%
10Y*
12.25%

^NDX

1D
3.43%
1M
-4.89%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-3.81%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
18.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WFIVX vs. ^NDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WFIVX
WFIVX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
WFIVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFIVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFIVX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
WFIVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFIVX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

^NDX
^NDX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
^NDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^NDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
^NDX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
^NDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
^NDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WFIVX vs. ^NDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX) and NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WFIVX^NDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.80

1.02

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.25

1.60

-0.35

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.23

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.99

1.82

-0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.80

6.70

-1.90

WFIVX vs. ^NDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WFIVX Sharpe Ratio is 0.80, which is comparable to the ^NDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WFIVX and ^NDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WFIVX^NDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

1.02

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.54

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

0.80

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.55

-0.18

Correlation

The correlation between WFIVX and ^NDX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Drawdowns

WFIVX vs. ^NDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WFIVX drawdown since its inception was -55.43%, smaller than the maximum ^NDX drawdown of -82.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WFIVX and ^NDX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WFIVX^NDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.43%

-82.90%

+27.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.39%

-12.72%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.93%

-35.56%

+10.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.62%

-35.56%

+0.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.89%

-9.11%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.71%

-24.72%

+13.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

3.45%

-0.89%

Volatility

WFIVX vs. ^NDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wilshire 5000 Index Portfolio (WFIVX) is 4.37%, while NASDAQ 100 Index (^NDX) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that WFIVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^NDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WFIVX^NDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.37%

6.57%

-2.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.28%

12.88%

-3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.35%

22.75%

-4.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.09%

22.62%

-5.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

22.48%

-4.33%