PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VITAX vs. VRGWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VITAX vs. VRGWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VITAX achieves a 20.41% return, which is significantly higher than VRGWX's 0.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VITAX has outperformed VRGWX with an annualized return of 24.06%, while VRGWX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.87% annualized return.


VITAX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-1.37%
6M
20.46%
YTD
20.41%
1Y
34.82%
3Y*
26.49%
5Y*
17.82%
10Y*
24.06%
ALL TIME*
14.78%

VRGWX

1D
0.81%
1M
-2.43%
6M
1.53%
YTD
0.30%
1Y
10.12%
3Y*
19.26%
5Y*
12.64%
10Y*
17.87%
ALL TIME*
16.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

VITAX vs. VRGWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VITAX
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares
20.41%21.78%29.26%52.69%-29.67%30.36%45.93%48.72%2.51%37.07%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.30%18.32%33.25%42.65%-29.18%32.42%38.38%36.30%-1.59%30.11%

Correlation

The correlation between VITAX and VRGWX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010

0.95

The correlation between VITAX and VRGWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VITAX vs. VRGWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VITAX
VITAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
VITAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
VITAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VRGWX
VRGWX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
VRGWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRGWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRGWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
VRGWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRGWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VITAX vs. VRGWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VITAXVRGWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.09

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

0.50

+1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.24

1.48

+3.76

VITAX vs. VRGWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VITAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is higher than the VRGWX Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VITAX and VRGWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VITAX vs. VRGWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VITAX drawdown since its inception was -54.81%, which is greater than VRGWX's maximum drawdown of -32.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VITAX and VRGWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VITAXVRGWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.81%

-32.70%

-22.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.38%

-16.19%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-23.44%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.10%

-32.70%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

-32.70%

-2.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.91%

-7.97%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.01%

-4.89%

-3.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.08%

5.40%

+0.68%

Volatility

VITAX vs. VRGWX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) has a higher volatility of 8.42% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRGWX) at 6.43%. This indicates that VITAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VRGWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VITAXVRGWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.42%

6.43%

+1.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.17%

14.06%

+6.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.34%

17.52%

+6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.03%

21.93%

+4.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.12%

21.29%

+3.83%

VITAX vs. VRGWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VITAX has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VRGWX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VITAX vs. VRGWX - Dividend Comparison

VITAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, less than VRGWX's 0.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VITAX
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.38%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.63%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%
VRGWX
Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares
0.49%0.35%0.56%0.71%0.99%4.18%0.77%1.03%1.22%1.22%1.52%1.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, VITAX and VRGWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VITAX has higher volatility (8.42%) compared to VRGWX (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VITAX dropped -54.81% vs VRGWX's -32.70%.

VITAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VITAX and VRGWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer