PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VISA.NEO vs. COKE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VISA.NEO vs. COKE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Visa Inc CDR (VISA.NEO) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VISA.NEO is traded in CAD, while COKE is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the COKE values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VISA.NEO achieves a -9.28% return, which is significantly lower than COKE's 12.93% return.


VISA.NEO

1D
1.84%
1M
-0.66%
YTD
-9.28%
6M
-2.75%
1Y
-14.42%
3Y*
11.23%
5Y*
10Y*

COKE

1D
-3.89%
1M
-19.26%
YTD
12.93%
6M
2.70%
1Y
61.97%
3Y*
39.93%
5Y*
36.77%
10Y*
31.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VISA.NEO vs. COKE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VISA.NEO
Visa Inc CDR
-9.28%9.26%20.90%25.24%-4.88%-3.59%
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
12.93%17.01%50.67%78.89%-11.18%53.90%

Correlation

The correlation between VISA.NEO and COKE is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021

0.19

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VISA.NEO:

CA$56.64B

COKE:

$11.34B

EPS

VISA.NEO:

CA$10.35

COKE:

$7.14

PE Ratio

VISA.NEO:

2.83

COKE:

23.86

PS Ratio

VISA.NEO:

1.42

COKE:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

VISA.NEO:

CA$40.00B

COKE:

$7.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VISA.NEO:

CA$32.15B

COKE:

$2.95B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VISA.NEO vs. COKE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VISA.NEO
VISA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
VISA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VISA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
VISA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VISA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
VISA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

COKE
COKE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
COKE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COKE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
COKE Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
COKE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
COKE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VISA.NEO vs. COKE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Visa Inc CDR (VISA.NEO) and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VISA.NEOCOKEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.32

-0.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

2.54

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

7.75

-8.97

VISA.NEO vs. COKE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VISA.NEO Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the COKE Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VISA.NEO and COKE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VISA.NEOCOKEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.66

1.80

-2.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.76

-0.45

Drawdowns

VISA.NEO vs. COKE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VISA.NEO drawdown since its inception was -24.78%, smaller than the maximum COKE drawdown of -50.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VISA.NEO and COKE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VISA.NEOCOKEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.78%

-50.98%

+26.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.55%

-24.56%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.55%

-30.02%

+8.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.28%

-20.31%

+5.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-15.40%

+8.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.84%

8.02%

+3.82%

Volatility

VISA.NEO vs. COKE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Visa Inc CDR (VISA.NEO) is 5.32%, while Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. (COKE) has a volatility of 18.95%. This indicates that VISA.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COKE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VISA.NEOCOKEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

18.95%

-13.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.39%

29.25%

-11.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.07%

34.73%

-12.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.03%

36.80%

-13.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.03%

36.74%

-13.71%

Dividends

VISA.NEO vs. COKE - Dividend Comparison

VISA.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than COKE's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.
0.59%0.65%1.59%0.54%0.20%0.16%0.38%0.35%0.56%0.46%0.56%0.55%
VISA.NEO
Visa Inc CDR
1.13%0.98%0.93%0.98%0.99%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

VISA.NEO vs. COKE - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Visa Inc CDR and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
10.72B
1.85B
(VISA.NEO) Total Revenue
(COKE) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. VISA.NEO values in CAD, COKE values in USD

VISA.NEO vs. COKE - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Visa Inc CDR and Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
81.5%
39.4%
Portfolio components
VISA.NEO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc CDR reported a gross profit of 8.74B and revenue of 10.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.5%.

COKE - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported a gross profit of 727.08M and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.4%.

VISA.NEO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc CDR reported an operating income of 7.05B and revenue of 10.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.8%.

COKE - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported an operating income of 237.52M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.

VISA.NEO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Visa Inc CDR reported a net income of 5.09B and revenue of 10.72B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.

COKE - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Coca-Cola Consolidated, Inc. reported a net income of 111.56M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VISA.NEO and COKE have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VISA.NEO and COKE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer