VIR vs. NVAX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR) and Novavax, Inc. (NVAX).

Performance

VIR vs. NVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR) and Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

VIR vs. NVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
VIR Vir Biotechnology, Inc.	49.59%	-17.85%	-27.04%	-60.25%	-39.55%	56.35%	112.96%	-10.31%
NVAX Novavax, Inc.	19.35%	-16.42%	67.50%	-53.31%	-92.81%	28.30%	2,701.76%	-12.72%

Fundamentals

Market Cap VIR : $1.26B NVAX : $1.39B
EPS VIR : -$3.15 NVAX : $2.58
PS Ratio VIR : 18.27 NVAX : 1.22
Total Revenue (TTM) VIR : $68.56M NVAX : $1.12B
Gross Profit (TTM) VIR : $68.53M NVAX : $1.05B
EBITDA (TTM) VIR : -$459.23M NVAX : $452.80M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIR achieves a 49.59% return, which is significantly higher than NVAX's 19.35% return.

VIR

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -3.43%
• YTD: 49.59%
• 6M: 58.25%
• 1Y: 45.95%
• 3Y*: -27.09%
• 5Y*: -28.88%
• 10Y*: —

NVAX

• 1D: -1.47%
• 1M: -20.67%
• YTD: 19.35%
• 6M: -15.58%
• 1Y: 33.67%
• 3Y*: 4.99%
• 5Y*: -46.66%
• 10Y*: -23.02%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

VIR vs. NVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIR

VIR Risk / Return Rank: 64
VIR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
VIR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
VIR Omega Ratio Rank: 61
VIR Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
VIR Martin Ratio Rank: 63

NVAX

NVAX Risk / Return Rank: 57
NVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
NVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
NVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
NVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
NVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIR vs. NVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR) and Novavax, Inc. (NVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	VIR	NVAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.64	0.44	+0.19
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.24	+0.21
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.14	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.15	0.70	+0.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	1.48	+0.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

VIR vs. NVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIR Sharpe Ratio is 0.64, which is higher than the NVAX Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIR and NVAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	VIR	NVAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64	0.44	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	-0.44	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.07	-0.07	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between VIR and NVAX is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

VIR vs. NVAX - Dividend Comparison

Neither VIR nor NVAX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

VIR vs. NVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIR drawdown since its inception was -94.85%, roughly equal to the maximum NVAX drawdown of -98.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIR and NVAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	VIR	NVAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.85%	-98.82%	+3.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.95%	-35.94%	+1.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.15%	-98.61%	+6.46%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-98.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-89.14%	-97.49%	+8.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-67.01%	-70.56%	+3.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.04%	16.94%	-0.90%

Volatility

VIR vs. NVAX - Volatility Comparison

Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR) has a higher volatility of 17.00% compared to Novavax, Inc. (NVAX) at 15.78%. This indicates that VIR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VIR	NVAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.00%	15.78%	+1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	52.42%	47.46%	+4.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.61%	76.52%	-3.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	72.88%	107.05%	-34.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	97.01%	115.25%	-18.24%

Financials