VIR vs. RXRX
VIR (Vir Biotechnology, Inc.) and RXRX (Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Biotechnology industry within the Healthcare sector. Over the past 5 years, VIR returned -28.26%/yr vs -33.81%/yr for RXRX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VIR vs. RXRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIR achieves a 44.94% return, which is significantly higher than RXRX's -11.74% return.
VIR
- 1D
- -3.21%
- 1M
- -12.60%
- YTD
- 44.94%
- 6M
- 55.24%
- 1Y
- 72.39%
- 3Y*
- -31.58%
- 5Y*
- -28.26%
- 10Y*
- —
RXRX
- 1D
- -4.75%
- 1M
- 6.49%
- YTD
- -11.74%
- 6M
- -16.44%
- 1Y
- -17.39%
- 3Y*
- -24.02%
- 5Y*
- -33.81%
- 10Y*
- —
VIR vs. RXRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIR Vir Biotechnology, Inc. | 44.94% | -17.85% | -27.04% | -60.25% | -39.55% | -9.72% |
RXRX Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | -11.74% | -39.50% | -31.44% | 27.89% | -54.99% | -45.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIR and RXRX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2021 | 0.45 |
The correlation between VIR and RXRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
VIR:
$1.29B
RXRX:
$1.91B
VIR:
-$3.14
RXRX:
-$1.17
VIR:
18.81
RXRX:
26.15
VIR:
1.58
RXRX:
1.86
VIR:
$65.50M
RXRX:
$66.29M
VIR:
$183.11M
RXRX:
-$22.83M
VIR:
-$448.10M
RXRX:
-$505.90M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIR vs. RXRX — Risk / Return Rank
VIR
RXRX
VIR vs. RXRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR) and Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIR | RXRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.05 | -0.24 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 0.16 | +1.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.02 | +0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.76 | -0.23 | +3.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.85 | -0.39 | +7.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIR | RXRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05 | -0.24 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.39 | -0.36 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.07 | -0.37 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
VIR vs. RXRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIR drawdown since its inception was -94.85%, roughly equal to the maximum RXRX drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIR and RXRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIR | RXRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.85% | -93.13% | -1.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.82% | -58.17% | +30.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -84.32% | -82.09% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.15% | -93.13% | +0.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.48% | -91.27% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -67.55% | -75.33% | +7.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.24% | 35.04% | -23.80% |
Volatility
VIR vs. RXRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vir Biotechnology, Inc. (VIR) is 16.12%, while Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (RXRX) has a volatility of 18.74%. This indicates that VIR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RXRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIR | RXRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.12% | 18.74% | -2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 50.51% | 44.79% | +5.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.24% | 73.46% | -4.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.77% | 93.46% | -20.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 96.13% | 93.62% | +2.51% |
Dividends
VIR vs. RXRX - Dividend Comparison
Neither VIR nor RXRX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
VIR vs. RXRX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vir Biotechnology, Inc. and Recursion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
VIR and RXRX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RXRX has higher volatility (18.74%) compared to VIR (16.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIR dropped -94.85% vs RXRX's -93.13%.
VIR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIR and RXRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer