VIOV vs. DFAS
VIOV (Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF) and DFAS (Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VIOV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index, while DFAS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. VIOV is passively managed, while DFAS is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, VIOV returned 14.29%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for DFAS. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. VIOV charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for DFAS.
Performance
VIOV vs. DFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIOV achieves a 15.28% return, which is significantly higher than DFAS's 12.81% return.
VIOV
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- 2.26%
- YTD
- 15.28%
- 6M
- 14.76%
- 1Y
- 37.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.29%
- 5Y*
- 5.75%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
DFAS
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 2.19%
- YTD
- 12.81%
- 6M
- 12.10%
- 1Y
- 27.65%
- 3Y*
- 15.22%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIOV vs. DFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 15.28% | 6.63% | 7.44% | 15.36% | -11.37% | -1.73% |
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 12.81% | 8.17% | 10.21% | 17.83% | -13.84% | 4.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIOV and DFAS is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2021 | 0.97 |
The correlation between VIOV and DFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIOV vs. DFAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIOV
DFAS
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Real Estate
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Financial Services
VIOV
DFAS
Consumer Cyclical
VIOV
DFAS
Industrials
VIOV
DFAS
Technology
VIOV
DFAS
Energy
VIOV
DFAS
Real Estate
VIOV
DFAS
Healthcare
VIOV
DFAS
Basic Materials
VIOV
DFAS
Consumer Defensive
VIOV
DFAS
Communication Services
VIOV
DFAS
Utilities
VIOV
DFAS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIOV vs. DFAS — Risk / Return Rank
VIOV
DFAS
VIOV vs. DFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) and Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIOV | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.03 | 1.66 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 2.46 | +0.47 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.99 | 2.97 | +1.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.00 | 10.17 | +2.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIOV | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 1.66 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.36 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
VIOV vs. DFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIOV drawdown since its inception was -47.36%, which is greater than DFAS's maximum drawdown of -26.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIOV and DFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIOV | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.36% | -26.13% | -21.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.33% | -9.36% | +0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.44% | -26.13% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.28% | -0.81% | -0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.38% | -8.31% | +0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.73% | +0.13% |
Volatility
VIOV vs. DFAS - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF (DFAS) at 4.31%. This indicates that VIOV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIOV | DFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 4.31% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.57% | 11.58% | -0.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.41% | 16.77% | +1.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 20.84% | +1.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.89% | 20.84% | +3.05% |
VIOV vs. DFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIOV has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DFAS's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIOV vs. DFAS - Dividend Comparison
VIOV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%, more than DFAS's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFAS Dimensional U.S. Small Cap ETF | 0.92% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 1.00% | 1.03% | 2.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIOV Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | 1.59% | 1.69% | 1.78% | 2.18% | 1.81% | 1.59% | 1.42% | 1.60% | 1.76% | 1.43% | 1.17% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, VIOV and DFAS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VIOV has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to DFAS (4.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIOV dropped -47.36% vs DFAS's -26.13%.
On 3-year performance, DFAS leads with 15.22% vs 14.29% for VIOV. On fees, VIOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, DFAS has been the lower-risk option at 4.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFAS has performed better with a 15.22% return vs 14.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VIOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for DFAS.
VIOV has the higher dividend yield at 1.59%, compared with 0.92% for DFAS.
VIOV is categorized as Small Cap Value Equities, while DFAS is Small Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VIOV and 0.34% for DFAS.
VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIOV and DFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer