PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VINIX vs. CGDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VINIX vs. CGDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares (VINIX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VINIX achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly lower than CGDV's 11.55% return.


VINIX

1D
1.75%
1M
-1.31%
YTD
8.58%
6M
8.93%
1Y
25.16%
3Y*
21.46%
5Y*
13.46%
10Y*
15.50%

CGDV

1D
0.66%
1M
0.35%
YTD
11.55%
6M
12.50%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
24.15%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VINIX vs. CGDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
VINIX
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares
8.58%17.85%26.28%25.77%-7.86%
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
11.55%25.50%20.10%28.81%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between VINIX and CGDV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.92

The correlation between VINIX and CGDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

VINIX vs. CGDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VINIX
CGDV

Technology

35.7%
34.1%

Financial Services

11.6%
6.8%

Communication Services

11.3%
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
10.6%

Healthcare

8.5%
11.5%

Industrials

8.3%
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
5.5%

Energy

3.5%
3.8%

Utilities

2.4%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.1%

Basic Materials

1.8%
2.9%

Technology

VINIX
35.7%
CGDV
34.1%

Financial Services

VINIX
11.6%
CGDV
6.8%

Communication Services

VINIX
11.3%
CGDV
8.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VINIX
10.2%
CGDV
10.6%

Healthcare

VINIX
8.5%
CGDV
11.5%

Industrials

VINIX
8.3%
CGDV
13.2%

Consumer Defensive

VINIX
4.9%
CGDV
5.5%

Energy

VINIX
3.5%
CGDV
3.8%

Utilities

VINIX
2.4%
CGDV
2.1%

Real Estate

VINIX
1.9%
CGDV
1.1%

Basic Materials

VINIX
1.8%
CGDV
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VINIX vs. CGDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VINIX
VINIX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
VINIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VINIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
VINIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
VINIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
VINIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

CGDV
CGDV Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
CGDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CGDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VINIX vs. CGDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares (VINIX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VINIXCGDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.74

2.83

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.44

13.19

-0.74

VINIX vs. CGDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VINIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.97, which is comparable to the CGDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VINIX and CGDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VINIX vs. CGDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VINIX drawdown since its inception was -55.19%, which is greater than CGDV's maximum drawdown of -21.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VINIX and CGDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VINIXCGDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.19%

-21.82%

-33.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-9.75%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-14.28%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-0.98%

-1.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.52%

-3.60%

-4.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.95%

2.09%

-0.14%

Volatility

VINIX vs. CGDV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares (VINIX) and Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV) have volatilities of 4.43% and 4.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VINIXCGDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.43%

4.52%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.70%

9.80%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

12.13%

+0.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.96%

15.57%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.09%

15.57%

+2.52%

VINIX vs. CGDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VINIX has a 0.04% expense ratio, which is lower than CGDV's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

VINIX vs. CGDV - Dividend Comparison

VINIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than CGDV's 1.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CGDV
Capital Group Dividend Value ETF
1.17%1.29%1.60%1.65%1.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VINIX
Vanguard Institutional Index Fund Institutional Shares
2.46%2.10%3.64%2.65%3.38%4.77%3.06%2.85%2.43%1.82%2.36%2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


VINIX and CGDV have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CGDV has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to VINIX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VINIX dropped -55.19% vs CGDV's -21.82%.

CGDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VINIX and CGDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer