VIMSX vs. FTHMX
VIMSX (Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund) and FTHMX (FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past year, VIMSX returned 18.59% vs 27.99% for FTHMX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VIMSX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.83%/yr for FTHMX.
Performance
VIMSX vs. FTHMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIMSX achieves a 10.48% return, which is significantly lower than FTHMX's 14.83% return.
VIMSX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- 3.66%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 18.59%
- 3Y*
- 16.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.88%
- 10Y*
- 11.40%
FTHMX
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.44%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.83%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VIMSX vs. FTHMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VIMSX Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund | 10.48% | 11.08% | 14.52% | 14.14% |
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 14.83% | 12.89% | 12.48% | 11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIMSX and FTHMX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between VIMSX and FTHMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIMSX vs. FTHMX — Risk / Return Rank
VIMSX
FTHMX
VIMSX vs. FTHMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund (VIMSX) and FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIMSX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.60 | 2.35 | -0.74 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.29 | 3.40 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.41 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 4.69 | -2.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | 16.43 | -7.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIMSX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.60 | 2.35 | -0.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.31 | -0.83 |
Drawdowns
VIMSX vs. FTHMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIMSX drawdown since its inception was -58.96%, which is greater than FTHMX's maximum drawdown of -20.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIMSX and FTHMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIMSX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.96% | -20.45% | -38.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -6.33% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.31% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.07% | -3.04% | -5.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.14% | 1.80% | +0.34% |
Volatility
VIMSX vs. FTHMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund (VIMSX) is 2.97%, while FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares (FTHMX) has a volatility of 3.45%. This indicates that VIMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTHMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIMSX | FTHMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 3.45% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 9.36% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.30% | 12.65% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.64% | 15.43% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.93% | 15.43% | +3.50% |
VIMSX vs. FTHMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIMSX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FTHMX's 0.83% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIMSX vs. FTHMX - Dividend Comparison
VIMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than FTHMX's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTHMX FullerThaler Behavioral Mid-Cap Equity Fund Institutional Shares | 0.29% | 0.33% | 0.28% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VIMSX Vanguard Mid Cap Index Fund | 1.23% | 1.03% | 1.37% | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.00% | 1.34% | 1.37% | 1.68% | 1.24% | 1.34% | 1.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, VIMSX and FTHMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FTHMX has higher volatility (3.45%) compared to VIMSX (2.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIMSX dropped -58.96% vs FTHMX's -20.45%.
FTHMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIMSX and FTHMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer