VIKSX vs. WWNPX
VIKSX (Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund) and WWNPX (Kinetics Paradigm Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, VIKSX returned -0.79%/yr vs 14.05%/yr for WWNPX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VIKSX charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.64%/yr for WWNPX.
Performance
VIKSX vs. WWNPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIKSX achieves a -2.93% return, which is significantly lower than WWNPX's 18.51% return.
VIKSX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.65%
- YTD
- -2.93%
- 6M
- -5.07%
- 1Y
- -10.05%
- 3Y*
- 3.33%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- —
WWNPX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -10.79%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 6M
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- -3.20%
- 3Y*
- 30.17%
- 5Y*
- 14.05%
- 10Y*
- 18.16%
VIKSX vs. WWNPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIKSX Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | -2.93% | -8.33% | 12.39% | 18.92% | -22.54% | 5.38% | 3.23% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 18.51% | -14.61% | 88.34% | -16.97% | 29.18% | 38.14% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIKSX and WWNPX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIKSX vs. WWNPX — Risk / Return Rank
VIKSX
WWNPX
VIKSX vs. WWNPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (VIKSX) and Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIKSX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | -0.06 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.77 | 0.14 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.02 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.45 | -0.09 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.95 | -0.18 | -0.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIKSX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.59 | -0.06 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.43 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.52 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
VIKSX vs. WWNPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIKSX drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, smaller than the maximum WWNPX drawdown of -67.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIKSX and WWNPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIKSX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.44% | -67.87% | +33.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.39% | -23.22% | +1.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -41.13% | +15.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.44% | -41.13% | +6.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.51% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.74% | -28.17% | +9.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.81% | -13.90% | +0.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.12% | 11.52% | -1.40% |
Volatility
VIKSX vs. WWNPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (VIKSX) is 5.15%, while Kinetics Paradigm Fund (WWNPX) has a volatility of 7.16%. This indicates that VIKSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WWNPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIKSX | WWNPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 7.16% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 26.77% | -14.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.18% | 32.74% | -16.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.85% | 32.84% | -13.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 28.58% | -9.75% |
VIKSX vs. WWNPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIKSX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than WWNPX's 1.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIKSX vs. WWNPX - Dividend Comparison
VIKSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WWNPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIKSX Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WWNPX Kinetics Paradigm Fund | 6.93% | 8.21% | 2.95% | 5.65% | 2.00% | 1.67% | 2.15% | 1.00% | 10.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIKSX and WWNPX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WWNPX has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to VIKSX (5.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIKSX dropped -34.44% vs WWNPX's -67.87%.
WWNPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.06 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIKSX and WWNPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer