VIKSX vs. KMKNX
VIKSX (Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund) and KMKNX (Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, VIKSX returned -1.00%/yr vs 15.91%/yr for KMKNX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VIKSX charges 1.06%/yr vs 1.40%/yr for KMKNX.
Performance
VIKSX vs. KMKNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIKSX achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than KMKNX's 14.60% return.
VIKSX
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 6M
- -5.83%
- 1Y
- -11.73%
- 3Y*
- 3.09%
- 5Y*
- -1.00%
- 10Y*
- —
KMKNX
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -6.02%
- YTD
- 14.60%
- 6M
- 10.65%
- 1Y
- 3.84%
- 3Y*
- 34.33%
- 5Y*
- 15.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.85%
VIKSX vs. KMKNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIKSX Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | -3.62% | -8.33% | 12.39% | 18.92% | -22.54% | 5.38% | 3.23% |
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 14.60% | -3.09% | 84.05% | -7.34% | 14.98% | 28.03% | 9.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIKSX and KMKNX is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2020 | 0.42 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIKSX vs. KMKNX — Risk / Return Rank
VIKSX
KMKNX
VIKSX vs. KMKNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (VIKSX) and Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VIKSX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 1.04 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.50 | 0.16 | -0.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 0.38 | -1.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VIKSX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.66 | 0.11 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.05 | 0.60 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.55 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
VIKSX vs. KMKNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIKSX drawdown since its inception was -34.44%, smaller than the maximum KMKNX drawdown of -65.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIKSX and KMKNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIKSX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.44% | -65.47% | +31.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.39% | -16.99% | -4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.02% | -28.27% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.44% | -31.47% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.31% | -15.96% | -3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.81% | -15.28% | +1.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.16% | 6.94% | +3.22% |
Volatility
VIKSX vs. KMKNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund (VIKSX) is 5.00%, while Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class (KMKNX) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that VIKSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KMKNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIKSX | KMKNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 6.46% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.45% | 19.52% | -7.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.19% | 23.37% | -7.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 26.43% | -7.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.83% | 23.65% | -4.82% |
VIKSX vs. KMKNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIKSX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is lower than KMKNX's 1.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIKSX vs. KMKNX - Dividend Comparison
VIKSX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KMKNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KMKNX Kinetics Market Opportunities Fund No Load Class | 0.58% | 0.66% | 0.81% | 0.87% | 1.36% | 1.56% | 0.26% | 0.33% | 9.13% | 0.64% |
VIKSX Virtus KAR Small-Mid Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIKSX and KMKNX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KMKNX has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to VIKSX (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIKSX dropped -34.44% vs KMKNX's -65.47%.
KMKNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.11 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VIKSX and KMKNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer