PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VIGI vs. XCEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VIGI vs. XCEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIGI) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VIGI achieves a 2.47% return, which is significantly lower than XCEM's 30.29% return. Over the past 10 years, VIGI has underperformed XCEM with an annualized return of 7.98%, while XCEM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.


VIGI

1D
0.03%
1M
0.19%
YTD
2.47%
6M
4.07%
1Y
5.29%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*
7.98%

XCEM

1D
2.17%
1M
-1.32%
YTD
30.29%
6M
35.41%
1Y
58.25%
3Y*
23.31%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
12.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VIGI vs. XCEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VIGI
Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETF
2.47%16.88%2.73%16.30%-16.79%12.51%14.66%27.53%-11.50%27.97%
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
30.29%34.05%0.42%19.96%-17.59%7.87%9.47%19.74%-11.75%34.78%

Correlation

The correlation between VIGI and XCEM is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2016

0.71

The correlation between VIGI and XCEM shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VIGI vs. XCEM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VIGI
XCEM

Financial Services

29.0%
22.8%

Industrials

17.1%
9.7%

Healthcare

14.6%
2.9%

Technology

11.5%
37.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.7%
3.0%

Utilities

4.8%
1.9%

Basic Materials

4.1%
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

3.1%
6.3%

Energy

2.8%
3.8%

Communication Services

1.3%
4.2%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.8%

Financial Services

VIGI
29.0%
XCEM
22.8%

Industrials

VIGI
17.1%
XCEM
9.7%

Healthcare

VIGI
14.6%
XCEM
2.9%

Technology

VIGI
11.5%
XCEM
37.1%

Consumer Defensive

VIGI
9.7%
XCEM
3.0%

Utilities

VIGI
4.8%
XCEM
1.9%

Basic Materials

VIGI
4.1%
XCEM
6.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VIGI
3.1%
XCEM
6.3%

Energy

VIGI
2.8%
XCEM
3.8%

Communication Services

VIGI
1.3%
XCEM
4.2%

Real Estate

VIGI
1.3%
XCEM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VIGI vs. XCEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VIGI
VIGI Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
VIGI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIGI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIGI Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
VIGI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIGI Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

XCEM
XCEM Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
XCEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XCEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XCEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
XCEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XCEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VIGI vs. XCEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIGI) and Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VIGIXCEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.48

-0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.50

4.05

-3.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.75

16.03

-14.28

VIGI vs. XCEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VIGI Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is lower than the XCEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VIGI and XCEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VIGIXCEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

2.64

-2.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

0.61

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.61

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.60

-0.07

Drawdowns

VIGI vs. XCEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VIGI drawdown since its inception was -31.01%, smaller than the maximum XCEM drawdown of -41.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIGI and XCEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VIGIXCEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.01%

-41.24%

+10.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.64%

-14.46%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.50%

-18.92%

+4.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.80%

-29.65%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.01%

-41.24%

+10.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.63%

-6.98%

+4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.17%

-8.59%

+2.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

3.64%

-0.61%

Volatility

VIGI vs. XCEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETF (VIGI) is 2.76%, while Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF (XCEM) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that VIGI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XCEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VIGIXCEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.76%

11.63%

-8.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

20.28%

-9.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.09%

22.22%

-9.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.45%

18.05%

-3.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.89%

19.83%

-3.94%

VIGI vs. XCEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

VIGI has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XCEM's 0.16% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VIGI vs. XCEM - Dividend Comparison

VIGI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than XCEM's 2.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIGI
Vanguard International Dividend Appreciation ETF
2.15%2.14%1.93%1.92%2.06%7.02%1.29%1.83%1.99%1.75%1.05%0.00%
XCEM
Columbia EM Core ex-China ETF
2.50%3.25%2.76%1.22%2.42%1.94%1.63%2.11%2.70%9.56%1.24%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


VIGI and XCEM have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XCEM has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to VIGI (2.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VIGI dropped -31.01% vs XCEM's -41.24%.

On 10-year performance, XCEM leads with 12.13% vs 7.98% for VIGI. On fees, VIGI is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, VIGI has been the lower-risk option at 2.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XCEM has performed better with a 12.13% return vs 7.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VIGI is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.16% for XCEM.

XCEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 2.15% for VIGI.

VIGI is categorized as Dividend, while XCEM is Emerging Markets Equities. VIGI tracks S&P Global Ex-U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while XCEM tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Ameriprise Financial. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for VIGI and 0.16% for XCEM.

XCEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VIGI and XCEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer