VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO (Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF) and ZEA.TO (BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - VIDY.TO tracks the FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index while ZEA.TO tracks the MSCI EAFE Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VIDY.TO returned 15.61%/yr vs 11.46%/yr for ZEA.TO. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VIDY.TO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for ZEA.TO.
Performance
VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VIDY.TO achieves a 13.41% return, which is significantly higher than ZEA.TO's 12.33% return.
VIDY.TO
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 2.20%
- YTD
- 13.41%
- 6M
- 13.36%
- 1Y
- 32.21%
- 3Y*
- 23.90%
- 5Y*
- 15.61%
- 10Y*
- —
ZEA.TO
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- 2.99%
- YTD
- 12.33%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 25.57%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.46%
- 10Y*
- 10.72%
VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 13.41% | 35.07% | 11.97% | 15.46% | 1.57% | 14.26% | -2.63% | 12.64% | -6.56% |
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF | 12.33% | 24.92% | 11.58% | 16.04% | -8.50% | 10.66% | 5.15% | 16.72% | -8.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between VIDY.TO and ZEA.TO is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018 | 0.79 |
The correlation between VIDY.TO and ZEA.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Industrials
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Healthcare
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Consumer Defensive
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Consumer Cyclical
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Energy
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Basic Materials
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Industrials
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Utilities
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Communication Services
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Real Estate
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Technology
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VIDY.TO
ZEA.TO
VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VIDY.TO | ZEA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.33 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.09 | 2.36 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.88 | 9.08 | +2.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VIDY.TO drawdown since its inception was -31.99%, which is greater than ZEA.TO's maximum drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VIDY.TO and ZEA.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VIDY.TO | ZEA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.99% | -27.80% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.48% | -10.91% | +0.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | -14.11% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.01% | -23.66% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.80% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -1.91% | +1.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -4.61% | +0.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.72% | 2.82% | -0.10% |
Volatility
VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF (VIDY.TO) is 3.68%, while BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that VIDY.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VIDY.TO | ZEA.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 5.26% | -1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.91% | 12.41% | -1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.36% | 14.52% | -1.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 13.63% | -0.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.43% | 14.79% | +1.64% |
VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VIDY.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEA.TO's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
VIDY.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Dividend Comparison
VIDY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%, more than ZEA.TO's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VIDY.TO Vanguard FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 2.97% | 2.80% | 3.64% | 3.91% | 4.39% | 3.30% | 3.36% | 3.37% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF | 1.90% | 2.17% | 2.78% | 3.02% | 3.08% | 2.49% | 2.74% | 2.95% | 3.05% | 2.40% | 2.80% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VIDY.TO and ZEA.TO have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEA.TO is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEA.TO is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for VIDY.TO.
VIDY.TO tracks FTSE Developed ex North America High Dividend Yield Index, while ZEA.TO tracks MSCI EAFE Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for VIDY.TO and 0.22% for ZEA.TO.
Find the right allocation for VIDY.TO and ZEA.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer