VICR vs. NVDA
VICR (Vicor Corporation) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — VICR in Electronic Components, NVDA in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, VICR returned 35.20%/yr vs 64.62%/yr for NVDA. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
VICR vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VICR achieves a 89.21% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 7.77% return. Over the past 10 years, VICR has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 35.20%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 64.62% annualized return.
VICR
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -26.71%
- 6M
- 31.52%
- YTD
- 89.21%
- 1Y
- 372.96%
- 3Y*
- 33.07%
- 5Y*
- 12.40%
- 10Y*
- 35.20%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.83%
NVDA
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- 6M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 7.77%
- 1Y
- 15.71%
- 3Y*
- 62.93%
- 5Y*
- 59.52%
- 10Y*
- 64.62%
- ALL TIME*
- 36.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $25.46B | $26.13B | $31.85B | |
| $233.23M | $213.12M | $256.68M |
VICR vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VICR Vicor Corporation | 89.21% | 126.82% | 7.52% | -16.39% | -57.67% | 37.69% | 97.39% | 23.63% | 80.81% | 38.41% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 7.77% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between VICR and NVDA is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.37 |
The correlation between VICR and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
VICR:
$9.40B
NVDA:
$4.86T
VICR:
$3.12
NVDA:
$6.53
VICR:
66.44
NVDA:
30.73
VICR:
0.15
NVDA:
0.17
VICR:
20.36
NVDA:
19.35
VICR:
11.86
NVDA:
25.05
VICR:
$474.01M
NVDA:
$253.49B
VICR:
$268.42M
NVDA:
$187.95B
VICR:
$127.59M
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VICR vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
VICR
NVDA
VICR vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vicor Corporation (VICR) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VICR | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.09 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.12 | 0.65 | +6.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.42 | 1.32 | +25.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VICR vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VICR drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, roughly equal to the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICR and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VICR | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.26% | -89.72% | -2.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.88% | -20.21% | -31.67% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -59.25% | -36.88% | -22.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.47% | -66.34% | -14.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.47% | -66.34% | -14.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.40% | -14.74% | -30.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.31% | -36.07% | -22.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.96% | 9.90% | +4.06% |
Volatility
VICR vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Vicor Corporation (VICR) has a higher volatility of 34.42% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.04%. This indicates that VICR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VICR | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.42% | 12.04% | +22.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 75.16% | 28.30% | +46.86% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 90.55% | 36.41% | +54.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.65% | 51.87% | +22.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.94% | 49.95% | +14.99% |
Dividends
VICR vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
VICR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
VICR Vicor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
VICR vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vicor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
VICR vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
VICR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vicor Corporation reported a gross profit of 83.12M and revenue of 143.35M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.0%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
VICR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vicor Corporation reported an operating income of 34.88M and revenue of 143.35M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.3%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
VICR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Vicor Corporation reported a net income of 49.77M and revenue of 143.35M, resulting in a net margin of 34.7%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
VICR and NVDA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VICR has higher volatility (34.42%) compared to NVDA (12.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICR dropped -92.26% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
VICR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.08 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VICR and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer