PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VICR vs. SANM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

VICR vs. SANM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vicor Corporation (VICR) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VICR achieves a 206.68% return, which is significantly higher than SANM's 64.62% return. Over the past 10 years, VICR has outperformed SANM with an annualized return of 41.52%, while SANM has yielded a comparatively lower 25.08% annualized return.


VICR

1D
-8.05%
1M
25.42%
YTD
206.68%
6M
208.47%
1Y
666.87%
3Y*
85.02%
5Y*
27.85%
10Y*
41.52%

SANM

1D
-2.53%
1M
0.24%
YTD
64.62%
6M
60.24%
1Y
169.37%
3Y*
63.22%
5Y*
44.58%
10Y*
25.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VICR vs. SANM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VICR
Vicor Corporation
206.68%126.82%7.52%-16.39%-57.67%37.69%97.39%23.63%80.81%38.41%
SANM
Sanmina Corporation
64.62%98.32%47.30%-10.33%38.18%30.01%-6.86%42.31%-27.09%-9.96%

Correlation

The correlation between VICR and SANM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 1993

0.35

The correlation between VICR and SANM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.50 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

VICR:

$15.88B

SANM:

$13.66B

EPS

VICR:

$2.98

SANM:

$4.72

PE Ratio

VICR:

112.84

SANM:

52.29

PEG Ratio

VICR:

0.26

SANM:

10.20

PS Ratio

VICR:

32.70

SANM:

1.20

PB Ratio

VICR:

21.07

SANM:

1.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

VICR:

$471.70M

SANM:

$11.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

VICR:

$277.43M

SANM:

$968.36M

EBITDA (TTM)

VICR:

$130.39M

SANM:

$365.81M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VICR vs. SANM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VICR
VICR Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
VICR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICR Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
VICR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

SANM
SANM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SANM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SANM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SANM Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SANM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SANM Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VICR vs. SANM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vicor Corporation (VICR) and Sanmina Corporation (SANM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VICRSANMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.70

1.41

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.03

5.21

+15.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

73.93

12.88

+61.04

VICR vs. SANM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VICR Sharpe Ratio is 7.94, which is higher than the SANM Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VICR and SANM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VICR vs. SANM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VICR drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, smaller than the maximum SANM drawdown of -99.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICR and SANM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VICRSANMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.26%

-99.66%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.01%

-32.69%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.55%

-32.69%

-33.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.47%

-33.92%

-46.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.47%

-55.85%

-24.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.05%

-30.21%

+22.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.40%

-71.39%

+12.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.09%

13.20%

-4.11%

Volatility

VICR vs. SANM - Volatility Comparison

Vicor Corporation (VICR) has a higher volatility of 31.95% compared to Sanmina Corporation (SANM) at 19.07%. This indicates that VICR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SANM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VICRSANMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.95%

19.07%

+12.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.60%

49.01%

+18.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

84.81%

68.39%

+16.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.92%

44.60%

+28.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.96%

42.09%

+21.87%

Dividends

VICR vs. SANM - Dividend Comparison

Neither VICR nor SANM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

VICR vs. SANM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Vicor Corporation and Sanmina Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
112.97M
4.01B
(VICR) Total Revenue
(SANM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

VICR vs. SANM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Vicor Corporation and Sanmina Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
55.2%
8.9%
Portfolio components
VICR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vicor Corporation reported a gross profit of 62.37M and revenue of 112.97M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.2%.

SANM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a gross profit of 354.98M and revenue of 4.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 8.9%.

VICR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vicor Corporation reported an operating income of 16.88M and revenue of 112.97M, resulting in an operating margin of 15.0%.

SANM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported an operating income of 157.01M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.

VICR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Vicor Corporation reported a net income of 20.66M and revenue of 112.97M, resulting in a net margin of 18.3%.

SANM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Sanmina Corporation reported a net income of 93.65M and revenue of 4.01B, resulting in a net margin of 2.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


VICR and SANM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VICR has higher volatility (31.95%) compared to SANM (19.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICR dropped -92.26% vs SANM's -99.66%.

VICR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.94 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VICR and SANM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer