PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VICE vs. VCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VICE vs. VCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VICE achieves a 3.62% return, which is significantly higher than VCR's -0.77% return.


VICE

1D
-0.84%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
3.62%
6M
2.59%
1Y
-1.03%
3Y*
7.32%
5Y*
-0.32%
10Y*

VCR

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.06%
YTD
-0.77%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
13.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VICE vs. VCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VICE
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
3.62%1.56%18.27%3.01%-18.28%8.50%22.45%20.05%-16.93%4.31%
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
-0.77%5.77%24.27%40.38%-35.15%24.86%48.36%27.45%-2.31%1.35%

Correlation

The correlation between VICE and VCR is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.61

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2017

0.69

Over the past year, the correlation between VICE and VCR has dropped to 0.49 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VICE vs. VCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VICE
VICE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
VICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICE Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
VICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

VCR
VCR Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
VCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCR Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCR Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VICE vs. VCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VICEVCRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.10

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

0.63

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.13

1.97

-2.10

VICE vs. VCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VICE Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the VCR Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VICE and VCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VICEVCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

0.53

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.02

0.26

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.51

-0.27

Drawdowns

VICE vs. VCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, smaller than the maximum VCR drawdown of -61.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and VCR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VICEVCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.27%

-61.54%

+23.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-15.59%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.55%

-27.36%

+7.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

-39.20%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.14%

-5.29%

-2.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.37%

-9.40%

-2.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.73%

4.97%

+2.76%

Volatility

VICE vs. VCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) is 4.53%, while Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF (VCR) has a volatility of 5.18%. This indicates that VICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VICEVCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

5.18%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.10%

13.09%

-3.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

18.48%

-5.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

23.99%

-6.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.19%

22.40%

-3.21%

VICE vs. VCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VCR's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

VICE vs. VCR - Dividend Comparison

VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than VCR's 0.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VCR
Vanguard Consumer Discretionary ETF
0.73%0.74%0.74%0.84%0.98%0.79%1.71%1.17%1.37%1.21%1.60%1.32%
VICE
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
0.76%0.79%1.46%1.69%0.96%0.99%0.00%2.47%1.72%0.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VICE and VCR have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VCR has higher volatility (5.18%) compared to VICE (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICE dropped -38.27% vs VCR's -61.54%.

On 5-year performance, VCR leads with 6.17% vs -0.32% for VICE. On fees, VCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VCR has performed better with a 6.17% return vs -0.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.

VICE has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.73% for VCR.

They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for VICE and 0.10% for VCR.

VCR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VICE and VCR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer