VICE vs. MSOS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) and MSOS (AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VICE is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while MSOS is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, VICE returned 1.67%/yr vs -34.67%/yr for MSOS. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. VICE charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for MSOS.

Performance

VICE vs. MSOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VICE achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly higher than MSOS's -10.38% return.

VICE

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -0.77%
• 6M: 2.71%
• YTD: 4.78%
• 1Y: -4.25%
• 3Y*: 5.90%
• 5Y*: 1.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 4.50%

MSOS

• 1D: 0.48%
• 1M: -13.50%
• 6M: 4.96%
• YTD: -10.38%
• 1Y: 37.34%
• 3Y*: -8.60%
• 5Y*: -34.67%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	$13.98M	$19.49M	$31.09M
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF	$15.61K	$15.90K	$15.22K

VICE vs. MSOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF	4.78%	1.56%	18.27%	3.01%	-18.28%	8.50%	16.65%
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	-10.38%	23.88%	-45.65%	0.29%	-72.68%	-29.69%	44.84%

Correlation

The correlation between VICE and MSOS is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.25
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2020	0.35

VICE vs. MSOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VICE	MSOS
Consumer Cyclical	45.3%	17.8%
Consumer Defensive	31.2%	-
Communication Services	7.2%	-
Real Estate	6.3%	50.2%
Basic Materials	5.3%	-
Technology	4.7%	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	2.5%
Industrials	-	29.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

VICE vs. MSOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

VICE

VICE Risk / Return Rank: 6
VICE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
VICE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
VICE Omega Ratio Rank: 6
VICE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
VICE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

MSOS

MSOS Risk / Return Rank: 31
MSOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MSOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
MSOS Omega Ratio Rank: 38
MSOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
MSOS Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

VICE vs. MSOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VICE	MSOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.37	0.45	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.44	1.55	-2.00
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.18	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.38	0.94	-1.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.63	1.64	-2.28

VICE vs. MSOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VICE Sharpe Ratio is -0.37, which is lower than the MSOS Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VICE and MSOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VICE vs. MSOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, smaller than the maximum MSOS drawdown of -96.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and MSOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	VICE	MSOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.27%	-96.25%	+57.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.59%	-52.91%	+39.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.55%	-81.71%	+65.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.92%	-94.45%	+64.53%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.11%	-92.29%	+85.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.26%	-72.23%	+59.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.17%	30.20%	-22.03%

Volatility

VICE vs. MSOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) is 4.42%, while AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF (MSOS) has a volatility of 13.19%. This indicates that VICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VICE	MSOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.42%	13.19%	-8.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	56.27%	-46.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.83%	111.22%	-97.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.57%	78.34%	-60.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.12%	73.62%	-54.50%

VICE vs. MSOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MSOS's 0.78% expense ratio.

Dividends

VICE vs. MSOS - Dividend Comparison

VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while MSOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MSOS AdvisorShares Pure US Cannabis ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF	0.75%	0.79%	1.46%	1.69%	0.96%	0.99%	0.00%	2.47%	1.72%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VICE and MSOS in my portfolio?

VICE and MSOS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VICE or MSOS?

MSOS has higher volatility (13.19%) compared to VICE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICE dropped -38.27% vs MSOS's -96.25%.

Which ETF is better, VICE or MSOS?

On 5-year performance, VICE leads with 1.67% vs -34.67% for MSOS. On fees, MSOS is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VICE or MSOS?

Over the 5-year period, VICE has performed better with a 1.67% return vs -34.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VICE or MSOS?

MSOS is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VICE or MSOS?

VICE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.00% for MSOS.

What is the main difference between VICE and MSOS?

VICE is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while MSOS is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for VICE and 0.78% for MSOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MSOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.