VICE vs. IBTF
VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) and IBTF (iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VICE is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while IBTF is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2025 Maturity US Treasury Index. VICE is actively managed, while IBTF is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VICE returned -0.32%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for IBTF. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VICE charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTF.
Performance
VICE vs. IBTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VICE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- -0.02%
- YTD
- 3.62%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- -1.03%
- 3Y*
- 7.32%
- 5Y*
- -0.32%
- 10Y*
- —
IBTF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 2.14%
- 3Y*
- 3.66%
- 5Y*
- 0.90%
- 10Y*
- —
VICE vs. IBTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 3.62% | 1.56% | 18.27% | 3.01% | -18.28% | 8.50% | 36.32% |
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 3.81% | 4.60% | 4.12% | -6.39% | -2.31% | 3.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between VICE and IBTF is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2020 | 0.00 |
The correlation between VICE and IBTF shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VICE vs. IBTF — Risk / Return Rank
VICE
IBTF
VICE vs. IBTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VICE | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -20.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 6.23 | -5.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.08 | 59.41 | -59.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.13 | 269.70 | -269.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VICE | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 7.08 | -7.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.39 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.23 | 0.44 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
VICE vs. IBTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, which is greater than IBTF's maximum drawdown of -10.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and IBTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VICE | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.27% | -10.45% | -27.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -0.04% | -13.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -0.67% | -18.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.23% | -9.53% | -25.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.14% | 0.00% | -8.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.37% | -3.33% | -9.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.73% | 0.01% | +7.72% |
Volatility
VICE vs. IBTF - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF (IBTF) at 0.00%. This indicates that VICE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VICE | IBTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 0.00% | +4.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.10% | 0.19% | +8.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.19% | 0.36% | +12.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.79% | 2.38% | +15.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.19% | 2.56% | +16.63% |
VICE vs. IBTF - Expense Ratio Comparison
VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTF's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
VICE vs. IBTF - Dividend Comparison
VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than IBTF's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTF iShares iBonds Dec 2025 Term Treasury ETF | 2.08% | 3.83% | 4.32% | 4.03% | 1.93% | 0.57% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 0.76% | 0.79% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 2.47% | 1.72% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VICE and IBTF have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VICE has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to IBTF (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICE dropped -38.27% vs IBTF's -10.45%.
On 5-year performance, IBTF leads with 0.90% vs -0.32% for VICE. On fees, IBTF is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IBTF has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IBTF has performed better with a 0.90% return vs -0.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBTF is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.
IBTF has the higher dividend yield at 2.08%, compared with 0.76% for VICE.
VICE is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while IBTF is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for VICE and 0.07% for IBTF.
IBTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.08 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VICE and IBTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer