VICE vs. GGME
VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) and GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VICE is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while GGME is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross. VICE is actively managed, while GGME is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VICE returned 1.67%/yr vs 3.29%/yr for GGME. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. VICE charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GGME.
Performance
VICE vs. GGME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VICE achieves a 4.78% return, which is significantly higher than GGME's 1.32% return.
VICE
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 4.78%
- 1Y
- -4.25%
- 3Y*
- 5.90%
- 5Y*
- 1.67%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.50%
GGME
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 7.73%
- YTD
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- -0.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.70%
- 5Y*
- 3.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.85%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.48%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $77.20K | $185.55K | $134.81K | |
| $15.61K | $15.90K | $15.22K |
VICE vs. GGME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 4.78% | 1.56% | 18.27% | 3.01% | -18.28% | 8.50% | 22.45% | 20.05% | -16.93% | 4.19% |
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 1.32% | 16.39% | 32.67% | 23.76% | -36.43% | 10.68% | 36.26% | 20.28% | 1.97% | 1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between VICE and GGME is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VICE and GGME has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VICE vs. GGME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VICE
GGME
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
VICE
GGME
Consumer Defensive
VICE
GGME
-
Communication Services
VICE
GGME
Real Estate
VICE
GGME
-
Basic Materials
VICE
GGME
-
Technology
VICE
GGME
Energy
VICE
-
GGME
-
Financial Services
VICE
-
GGME
Healthcare
VICE
-
GGME
-
Industrials
VICE
-
GGME
Utilities
VICE
-
GGME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VICE vs. GGME — Risk / Return Rank
VICE
GGME
VICE vs. GGME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VICE | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.00 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.09 | -0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.63 | -0.19 | -0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VICE vs. GGME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, smaller than the maximum GGME drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and GGME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VICE | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.27% | -69.13% | +30.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -25.23% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -25.23% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.92% | -44.72% | +14.80% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.11% | -8.44% | +1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.26% | -14.49% | +2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.17% | 11.66% | -3.49% |
Volatility
VICE vs. GGME - Volatility Comparison
AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) have volatilities of 4.42% and 4.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VICE | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 4.48% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 16.42% | -6.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.83% | 19.97% | -6.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.57% | 24.32% | -6.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.12% | 23.21% | -4.09% |
VICE vs. GGME - Expense Ratio Comparison
VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GGME's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VICE vs. GGME - Dividend Comparison
VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than GGME's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 2.31% | 0.76% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.16% | 1.11% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 0.75% | 0.79% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 2.47% | 1.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VICE and GGME have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGME has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to VICE (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICE dropped -38.27% vs GGME's -69.13%.
On 5-year performance, GGME leads with 3.29% vs 1.67% for VICE. On fees, GGME is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GGME has performed better with a 3.29% return vs 1.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GGME is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.
VICE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.02% for GGME.
VICE is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while GGME is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for VICE and 0.60% for GGME.
GGME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.11 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VICE and GGME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer