VICE vs. GGME
VICE (AdvisorShares Vice ETF) and GGME (Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VICE is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund actively managed by AdvisorShares, while GGME is a Technology Equities fund tracking the STOXX World AC NexGen Media Index - Benchmark TR Gross. VICE is actively managed, while GGME is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VICE returned -0.39%/yr vs 1.94%/yr for GGME. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VICE charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GGME.
Performance
VICE vs. GGME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VICE achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than GGME's -0.82% return.
VICE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 4.29%
- 6M
- 2.72%
- 1Y
- -0.93%
- 3Y*
- 7.06%
- 5Y*
- -0.39%
- 10Y*
- —
GGME
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -4.05%
- YTD
- -0.82%
- 6M
- -1.03%
- 1Y
- 1.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.00%
- 5Y*
- 1.94%
- 10Y*
- 10.10%
VICE vs. GGME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 4.29% | 1.56% | 18.27% | 3.01% | -18.28% | 8.50% | 22.45% | 20.05% | -16.93% | 4.19% |
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | -0.82% | 16.39% | 32.67% | 23.76% | -36.43% | 10.68% | 36.26% | 20.28% | 1.97% | 1.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between VICE and GGME is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2017 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VICE and GGME has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VICE vs. GGME - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VICE
GGME
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Communication Services
Technology
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
VICE
GGME
-
Consumer Cyclical
VICE
GGME
Basic Materials
VICE
GGME
-
Real Estate
VICE
GGME
-
Communication Services
VICE
GGME
Technology
VICE
GGME
Energy
VICE
-
GGME
-
Financial Services
VICE
-
GGME
Healthcare
VICE
-
GGME
-
Industrials
VICE
-
GGME
Utilities
VICE
-
GGME
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VICE vs. GGME — Risk / Return Rank
VICE
GGME
VICE vs. GGME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) and Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VICE | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.03 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.07 | 0.07 | -0.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.12 | 0.15 | -0.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VICE vs. GGME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VICE drawdown since its inception was -38.27%, smaller than the maximum GGME drawdown of -69.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VICE and GGME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VICE | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.27% | -69.13% | +30.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.59% | -25.23% | +11.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.55% | -25.23% | +5.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.02% | -44.90% | +10.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.55% | -10.38% | +2.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.34% | -14.52% | +2.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.90% | 11.39% | -3.49% |
Volatility
VICE vs. GGME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AdvisorShares Vice ETF (VICE) is 4.03%, while Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF (GGME) has a volatility of 8.48%. This indicates that VICE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VICE | GGME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.03% | 8.48% | -4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.38% | 16.02% | -6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 19.79% | -6.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.71% | 24.37% | -6.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.16% | 23.22% | -4.06% |
VICE vs. GGME - Expense Ratio Comparison
VICE has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than GGME's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
VICE vs. GGME - Dividend Comparison
VICE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, more than GGME's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGME Invesco Next Gen Media and Gaming ETF | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.08% | 2.31% | 0.76% | 0.39% | 0.38% | 0.50% | 0.93% | 0.33% | 0.16% | 1.11% |
VICE AdvisorShares Vice ETF | 0.75% | 0.79% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 0.96% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 2.47% | 1.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VICE and GGME have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGME has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to VICE (4.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VICE dropped -38.27% vs GGME's -69.13%.
On 5-year performance, GGME leads with 1.94% vs -0.39% for VICE. On fees, GGME is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, VICE has been the lower-risk option at 4.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GGME has performed better with a 1.94% return vs -0.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GGME is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for VICE.
VICE has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.02% for GGME.
VICE is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while GGME is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for VICE and 0.60% for GGME.
GGME currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VICE and GGME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer