PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VI.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VI.TO having a 16.22% return and QQC-F.TO slightly lower at 15.57%. Over the past 10 years, VI.TO has underperformed QQC-F.TO with an annualized return of 11.44%, while QQC-F.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.70% annualized return.


VI.TO

1D
-0.24%
1M
-1.42%
6M
10.87%
YTD
16.22%
1Y
31.31%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
12.97%
10Y*
11.44%

QQC-F.TO

1D
-0.05%
1M
-3.44%
6M
14.71%
YTD
15.57%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
22.50%
5Y*
14.03%
10Y*
19.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VI.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (CAD-hedged)
16.22%24.50%10.42%19.42%-7.79%17.72%2.77%21.87%-11.37%18.07%
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
15.57%18.79%24.19%52.81%-33.42%27.15%45.04%37.63%-2.23%31.94%

Correlation

The correlation between VI.TO and QQC-F.TO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 8, 2015

0.65

The correlation between VI.TO and QQC-F.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VI.TO
VI.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
VI.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VI.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VI.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
VI.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
VI.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

QQC-F.TO
QQC-F.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQC-F.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VI.TO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VI.TOQQC-F.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.26

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

2.07

+1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.66

7.23

+5.43

VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VI.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the QQC-F.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VI.TO and QQC-F.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VI.TO drawdown since its inception was -33.53%, smaller than the maximum QQC-F.TO drawdown of -36.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VI.TO and QQC-F.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VI.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.53%

-36.03%

+2.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-12.98%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.80%

-22.76%

+8.96%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.65%

-36.03%

+19.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.53%

-36.03%

+2.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.41%

-3.83%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.16%

-5.48%

+1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.48%

3.72%

-1.24%

Volatility

VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (CAD-hedged) (VI.TO) is 5.29%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged (QQC-F.TO) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that VI.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQC-F.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VI.TOQQC-F.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.29%

7.41%

-2.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.16%

15.16%

-2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.86%

18.46%

-3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.12%

22.84%

-8.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.73%

22.68%

-6.95%

VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VI.TO has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than QQC-F.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VI.TO vs. QQC-F.TO - Dividend Comparison

VI.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, more than QQC-F.TO's 0.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQC-F.TO
Invesco NASDAQ 100 Index ETF CAD Hedged
0.33%0.39%0.50%0.57%0.89%0.66%0.49%0.64%0.77%0.66%0.81%0.76%
VI.TO
Vanguard FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index ETF (CAD-hedged)
2.26%2.44%2.60%2.61%2.84%2.31%1.98%2.64%2.75%2.07%1.62%0.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


VI.TO and QQC-F.TO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QQC-F.TO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QQC-F.TO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for VI.TO.

VI.TO is categorized as International Equity, while QQC-F.TO is Nasdaq-100. VI.TO tracks FTSE Developed All Cap ex North America Index, while QQC-F.TO tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for VI.TO and 0.20% for QQC-F.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VI.TO and QQC-F.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer