VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

VHYL.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing) and XLEP.L (Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VHYL.L is a Dividend fund tracking the FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while XLEP.L is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Energy NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHYL.L returned 9.76%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for XLEP.L. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHYL.L charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLEP.L.

Performance

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

VHYL.L is traded in GBP, while XLEP.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XLEP.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYL.L achieves a 13.32% return, which is significantly lower than XLEP.L's 29.46% return. Over the past 10 years, VHYL.L has outperformed XLEP.L with an annualized return of 9.76%, while XLEP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.

VHYL.L

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.25%
• 6M: 9.49%
• YTD: 13.32%
• 1Y: 25.74%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: 9.76%

XLEP.L

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: 5.02%
• 6M: 21.46%
• YTD: 29.46%
• 1Y: 36.52%
• 3Y*: 13.28%
• 5Y*: 22.64%
• 10Y*: 8.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VHYL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing	13.32%	18.23%	11.22%	5.25%	5.95%	19.23%	-3.53%	17.00%	-6.59%	8.80%
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF	29.46%	1.41%	4.85%	-5.07%	81.43%	53.83%	-35.01%	5.84%	-14.05%	-9.46%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYL.L and XLEP.L is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.46
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2014	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between VHYL.L and XLEP.L has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VHYL.L	XLEP.L
Financial Services	28.2%	-
Industrials	12.2%	-
Healthcare	11.1%	-
Technology	9.5%	-
Energy	8.7%	100.0%
Consumer Defensive	8.5%	-
Consumer Cyclical	7.2%	-
Utilities	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	5.2%	-
Communication Services	3.4%	-
Real Estate	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYL.L

VHYL.L Risk / Return Rank: 91
VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
VHYL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
VHYL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
VHYL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
VHYL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

XLEP.L

XLEP.L Risk / Return Rank: 53
XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
XLEP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
XLEP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 56
XLEP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
XLEP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) and Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VHYL.L	XLEP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.98	1.52	+1.46
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.98	1.99	+1.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.27	+0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.69	2.25	+1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.31	5.44	+7.86

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYL.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.98, which is higher than the XLEP.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYL.L and XLEP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYL.L drawdown since its inception was -27.87%, smaller than the maximum XLEP.L drawdown of -63.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYL.L and XLEP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	VHYL.L	XLEP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.87%	-63.35%	+35.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.95%	-16.17%	+9.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.79%	-24.06%	+11.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-12.79%	-24.16%	+11.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-27.87%	-63.35%	+35.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.51%	-9.45%	+8.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.58%	-16.94%	+13.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.93%	6.69%	-4.76%

Volatility

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing (VHYL.L) is 1.92%, while Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF (XLEP.L) has a volatility of 7.24%. This indicates that VHYL.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLEP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VHYL.L	XLEP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.92%	7.24%	-5.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.95%	20.85%	-13.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.65%	23.96%	-15.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.76%	26.38%	-15.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.99%	28.17%	-15.18%

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYL.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than XLEP.L's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

VHYL.L vs. XLEP.L - Dividend Comparison

VHYL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, while XLEP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VHYL.L Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Distributing	2.53%	2.79%	3.08%	3.37%	3.67%	3.08%	3.28%	3.34%	3.63%	3.09%	2.88%	3.20%
XLEP.L Invesco US Energy Sector UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VHYL.L and XLEP.L in my portfolio?

VHYL.L and XLEP.L have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, VHYL.L or XLEP.L?

On fees, XLEP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, VHYL.L or XLEP.L?

XLEP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYL.L.

What is the main difference between VHYL.L and XLEP.L?

VHYL.L is categorized as Dividend, while XLEP.L is Energy Equities. VHYL.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while XLEP.L tracks MSCI World/Energy NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYL.L and 0.14% for XLEP.L.