PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHYG.L is traded in GBP, while VWRD.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VWRD.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with VHYG.L having a 11.62% return and VWRD.L slightly higher at 12.08%.


VHYG.L

1D
0.37%
1M
2.49%
YTD
11.62%
6M
12.92%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*

VWRD.L

1D
-0.10%
1M
5.24%
YTD
12.08%
6M
12.23%
1Y
29.86%
3Y*
18.05%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
13.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHYG.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF
11.62%18.36%10.99%5.01%6.20%19.28%-3.61%-18.20%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
12.05%13.66%19.71%16.20%-8.46%19.64%12.72%1.88%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYG.L and VWRD.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019

0.77

The correlation between VHYG.L and VWRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHYG.L
VWRD.L

Financial Services

28.6%
16.1%

Industrials

12.3%
10.2%

Healthcare

11.2%
8.1%

Energy

9.4%
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
4.9%

Technology

7.7%
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.0%
9.1%

Utilities

5.7%
2.9%

Basic Materials

5.1%
3.6%

Communication Services

3.5%
8.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
1.6%

Financial Services

VHYG.L
28.6%
VWRD.L
16.1%

Industrials

VHYG.L
12.3%
VWRD.L
10.2%

Healthcare

VHYG.L
11.2%
VWRD.L
8.1%

Energy

VHYG.L
9.4%
VWRD.L
4.3%

Consumer Defensive

VHYG.L
8.7%
VWRD.L
4.9%

Technology

VHYG.L
7.7%
VWRD.L
30.2%

Consumer Cyclical

VHYG.L
7.0%
VWRD.L
9.1%

Utilities

VHYG.L
5.7%
VWRD.L
2.9%

Basic Materials

VHYG.L
5.1%
VWRD.L
3.6%

Communication Services

VHYG.L
3.5%
VWRD.L
8.9%

Real Estate

VHYG.L
0.9%
VWRD.L
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYG.L
VHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRD.L
VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHYG.LVWRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.47

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

4.27

-0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

16.46

-1.64

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is comparable to the VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYG.L and VWRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHYG.LVWRD.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

2.51

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.88

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.90

-0.49

Drawdowns

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYG.L drawdown since its inception was -39.80%, which is greater than VWRD.L's maximum drawdown of -25.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYG.L and VWRD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYG.LVWRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.80%

-25.84%

-13.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-6.96%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.76%

-18.11%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.76%

-18.11%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.43%

+0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-3.47%

-4.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.81%

+0.11%

Volatility

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) is 2.27%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that VHYG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYG.LVWRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

3.68%

-1.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

9.26%

-2.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.16%

11.85%

-2.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

14.07%

-2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

15.29%

+0.62%

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYG.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRD.L's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYG.L vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

VHYG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VHYG.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VWRD.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.24%1.38%1.52%1.69%2.05%1.48%1.47%1.88%2.29%1.82%2.04%2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYG.L and VWRD.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRD.L is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRD.L is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYG.L.

VHYG.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD, while VWRD.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYG.L and 0.22% for VWRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYG.L and VWRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer