PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHYG.L is traded in GBP, while VDCA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VDCA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYG.L achieves a 11.62% return, which is significantly higher than VDCA.L's 1.09% return.


VHYG.L

1D
0.37%
1M
2.49%
YTD
11.62%
6M
12.92%
1Y
28.77%
3Y*
15.99%
5Y*
11.68%
10Y*

VDCA.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.97%
YTD
1.09%
6M
0.31%
1Y
5.13%
3Y*
2.63%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHYG.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF
11.62%18.36%10.99%5.01%6.20%19.28%-3.61%-18.20%
VDCA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation
1.06%-1.67%7.39%0.12%7.63%0.73%0.52%-4.88%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYG.L and VDCA.L is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2019

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYG.L
VHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VDCA.L
VDCA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VDCA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VDCA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHYG.LVDCA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.14

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.10

1.01

+3.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.82

2.82

+12.00

VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the VDCA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYG.L and VDCA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHYG.LVDCA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.10

0.78

+2.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.05

0.44

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.28

+0.14

Drawdowns

VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYG.L drawdown since its inception was -39.80%, which is greater than VDCA.L's maximum drawdown of -15.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYG.L and VDCA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYG.LVDCA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.80%

-15.72%

-24.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-5.00%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.76%

-8.97%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.76%

-15.72%

+2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.30%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.23%

-6.93%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.80%

+0.12%

Volatility

VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF (VHYG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.27% compared to Vanguard USD Corporate 1-3 Year Bond UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (VDCA.L) at 1.81%. This indicates that VHYG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VDCA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYG.LVDCA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

1.81%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.12%

5.03%

+2.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.16%

6.50%

+2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.12%

8.26%

+2.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.91%

8.90%

+7.01%

VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYG.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VDCA.L's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYG.L vs. VDCA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VHYG.L nor VDCA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYG.L and VDCA.L have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VDCA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VDCA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYG.L.

VHYG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VDCA.L is Short-Term Bond. VHYG.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield NR USD, while VDCA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Corporate - United States Dollar Index 1-3 Year. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYG.L and 0.09% for VDCA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYG.L and VDCA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer