PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VHYG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHYG.L achieves a 13.80% return, which is significantly higher than V3GS.L's 2.15% return.


VHYG.L

1D
0.28%
1M
2.42%
YTD
13.80%
6M
14.70%
1Y
30.90%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
12.09%
10Y*

V3GS.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.17%
YTD
2.15%
6M
2.55%
1Y
7.79%
3Y*
9.59%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
VHYG.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
13.80%18.36%10.98%5.02%6.20%9.32%
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
2.15%10.93%7.79%12.25%-12.52%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between VHYG.L and V3GS.L is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 20, 2021

0.10

The correlation between VHYG.L and V3GS.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHYG.L
VHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
VHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

V3GS.L
V3GS.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3GS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VHYG.L) and Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VHYG.LV3GS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.39

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.44

3.63

+0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.96

12.41

+3.55

VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHYG.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is higher than the V3GS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHYG.L and V3GS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHYG.L drawdown since its inception was -39.80%, which is greater than V3GS.L's maximum drawdown of -18.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHYG.L and V3GS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHYG.LV3GS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.80%

-18.23%

-21.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

-2.14%

-4.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.90%

-2.73%

-17.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.90%

-18.23%

-1.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-4.54%

-5.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

0.63%

+1.30%

Volatility

VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (VHYG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.18% compared to Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating (V3GS.L) at 1.12%. This indicates that VHYG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3GS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHYG.LV3GS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

1.12%

+1.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.99%

3.02%

+3.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.24%

4.03%

+5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.57%

5.84%

+11.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

5.80%

+13.90%

VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHYG.L has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than V3GS.L's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHYG.L vs. V3GS.L - Dividend Comparison

VHYG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while V3GS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
V3GS.L
Vanguard ESG Global Corporate Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Accumulating
2.91%4.00%4.25%4.00%2.43%0.59%
VHYG.L
Vanguard FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHYG.L and V3GS.L have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3GS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3GS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for VHYG.L.

VHYG.L is categorized as Dividend, while V3GS.L is Global Corporate Bonds. VHYG.L tracks FTSE All-World High Dividend Yield Index, while V3GS.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Agg Corp TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for VHYG.L and 0.15% for V3GS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHYG.L and V3GS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer