PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHVG.L achieves a 11.81% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.92% return.


VHVG.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
5.52%
YTD
11.81%
6M
12.27%
1Y
29.87%
3Y*
18.37%
5Y*
13.30%
10Y*

TDGB.L

1D
0.48%
1M
0.92%
YTD
8.92%
6M
11.81%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
20.13%
5Y*
17.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
11.81%13.85%19.99%17.54%-8.66%23.31%12.56%1.61%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.92%30.88%10.65%9.06%22.49%19.59%-5.61%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between VHVG.L and TDGB.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.67

Over the past year, the correlation between VHVG.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHVG.L
TDGB.L

Technology

29.0%
0.3%

Financial Services

15.6%
31.7%

Industrials

11.5%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
3.8%

Communication Services

9.0%
8.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
10.1%

Energy

4.1%
19.7%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.2%

Utilities

2.6%
6.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.0%

Technology

VHVG.L
29.0%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Financial Services

VHVG.L
15.6%
TDGB.L
31.7%

Industrials

VHVG.L
11.5%
TDGB.L
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VHVG.L
9.3%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Communication Services

VHVG.L
9.0%
TDGB.L
8.7%

Healthcare

VHVG.L
8.5%
TDGB.L
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

VHVG.L
5.1%
TDGB.L
10.1%

Energy

VHVG.L
4.1%
TDGB.L
19.7%

Basic Materials

VHVG.L
3.4%
TDGB.L
1.2%

Utilities

VHVG.L
2.6%
TDGB.L
6.2%

Real Estate

VHVG.L
2.0%
TDGB.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVG.L
VHVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHVG.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.55

1.59

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.29

6.26

-1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.65

20.72

-3.07

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVG.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.90, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVG.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHVG.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.90

3.15

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.55

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.98

-0.09

Drawdowns

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVG.L drawdown since its inception was -25.41%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -29.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVG.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVG.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.41%

-29.60%

+4.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.94%

-4.66%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.96%

-12.41%

-5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.96%

-12.41%

-5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-1.47%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.28%

-3.70%

+0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.41%

+0.28%

Volatility

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc (VHVG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.72% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.49%. This indicates that VHVG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVG.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.72%

2.49%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.53%

7.01%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.27%

9.28%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.97%

11.42%

+1.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.06%

14.44%

+0.62%

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHVG.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHVG.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

VHVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%
VHVG.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHVG.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHVG.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHVG.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

VHVG.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVG.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVG.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer