PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHVE.L is traded in USD, while VCPA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VCPA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHVE.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than VCPA.L's 0.26% return.


VHVE.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.47%
YTD
11.59%
6M
12.99%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

VCPA.L

1D
0.34%
1M
0.55%
YTD
0.26%
6M
1.01%
1Y
-98.94%
3Y*
-77.30%
5Y*
-59.90%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.59%22.18%17.93%24.66%-18.06%21.15%16.52%8.50%
VCPA.L
Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.26%-98.92%2.84%7.52%-15.06%-0.81%8.85%2.33%

Correlation

The correlation between VHVE.L and VCPA.L is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVE.L
VHVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VHVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

VCPA.L
VCPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHVE.LVCPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

0.29

+1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

-1.00

+4.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.41

-1.21

+15.63

VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the VCPA.L Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVE.L and VCPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHVE.LVCPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

-1.00

+3.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

-1.34

+2.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

-1.24

+2.08

Drawdowns

VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum VCPA.L drawdown of -99.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVE.L and VCPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVE.LVCPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-99.02%

+65.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-99.01%

+90.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.52%

-99.01%

+82.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

-99.02%

+72.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-98.99%

+98.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-17.31%

+11.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

81.79%

-79.81%

Volatility

VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to Vanguard USD Corporate Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VCPA.L) at 1.67%. This indicates that VHVE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVE.LVCPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

1.67%

+1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

4.17%

+5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

98.59%

-86.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

45.39%

-29.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

40.56%

-23.05%

VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than VCPA.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VHVE.L vs. VCPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither VHVE.L nor VCPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


VHVE.L and VCPA.L have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VCPA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCPA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for VHVE.L.

VHVE.L is categorized as Global Equities, while VCPA.L is Corporate Bonds. VHVE.L tracks FTSE Developed, while VCPA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVE.L and 0.09% for VCPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVE.L and VCPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer