VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L
VHVE.L (Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc) and TDGB.L (VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - VHVE.L tracks the FTSE Developed while TDGB.L tracks the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, VHVE.L returned 12.10%/yr vs 16.46%/yr for TDGB.L. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHVE.L charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for TDGB.L.
Performance
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
VHVE.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHVE.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.65% return.
VHVE.L
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 11.59%
- 6M
- 12.99%
- 1Y
- 28.64%
- 3Y*
- 21.52%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- —
TDGB.L
- 1D
- 0.53%
- 1M
- 0.06%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 23.22%
- 5Y*
- 16.46%
- 10Y*
- —
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 11.59% | 22.18% | 17.93% | 24.66% | -18.06% | 21.15% | 16.52% | 8.50% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 8.65% | 40.76% | 8.81% | 14.81% | 9.40% | 18.51% | -2.72% | 8.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHVE.L and TDGB.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VHVE.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Technology
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Financial Services
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Industrials
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Cyclical
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Communication Services
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Healthcare
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Consumer Defensive
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Energy
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Basic Materials
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Utilities
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Real Estate
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
VHVE.L
TDGB.L
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VHVE.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.46 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 5.52 | -2.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.41 | 15.71 | -1.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VHVE.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 2.53 | -0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 | 1.16 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.88 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHVE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVE.L and TDGB.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHVE.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.60% | -37.43% | +3.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.51% | -5.06% | -3.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.52% | -13.67% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.08% | -18.93% | -7.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.66% | -1.86% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.36% | -4.33% | -1.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.98% | 1.78% | +0.20% |
Volatility
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that VHVE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHVE.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.64% | 2.78% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 8.06% | +1.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.20% | 11.05% | +1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 14.21% | +1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.51% | 16.79% | +0.72% |
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
VHVE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.20% | 3.50% | 4.27% | 4.93% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 4.52% |
VHVE.L Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHVE.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VHVE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VHVE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.
VHVE.L tracks FTSE Developed, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVE.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.
Find the right allocation for VHVE.L and TDGB.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer