PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VHVE.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHVE.L achieves a 11.59% return, which is significantly higher than TDGB.L's 8.65% return.


VHVE.L

1D
-0.07%
1M
4.47%
YTD
11.59%
6M
12.99%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*

TDGB.L

1D
0.53%
1M
0.06%
YTD
8.65%
6M
12.64%
1Y
28.08%
3Y*
23.22%
5Y*
16.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VHVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc
11.59%22.18%17.93%24.66%-18.06%21.15%16.52%8.50%
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
8.65%40.76%8.81%14.81%9.40%18.51%-2.72%8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between VHVE.L and TDGB.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between VHVE.L and TDGB.L has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHVE.L
TDGB.L

Technology

29.0%
0.3%

Financial Services

15.6%
31.7%

Industrials

11.5%
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
3.8%

Communication Services

9.0%
8.7%

Healthcare

8.5%
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
10.1%

Energy

4.1%
19.7%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.2%

Utilities

2.6%
6.2%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.0%

Technology

VHVE.L
29.0%
TDGB.L
0.3%

Financial Services

VHVE.L
15.6%
TDGB.L
31.7%

Industrials

VHVE.L
11.5%
TDGB.L
3.9%

Consumer Cyclical

VHVE.L
9.3%
TDGB.L
3.8%

Communication Services

VHVE.L
9.0%
TDGB.L
8.7%

Healthcare

VHVE.L
8.5%
TDGB.L
14.4%

Consumer Defensive

VHVE.L
5.1%
TDGB.L
10.1%

Energy

VHVE.L
4.1%
TDGB.L
19.7%

Basic Materials

VHVE.L
3.4%
TDGB.L
1.2%

Utilities

VHVE.L
2.6%
TDGB.L
6.2%

Real Estate

VHVE.L
2.0%
TDGB.L
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHVE.L
VHVE.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VHVE.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHVE.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TDGB.L
TDGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHVE.LTDGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.46

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.35

5.52

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.41

15.71

-1.30

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHVE.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the TDGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHVE.L and TDGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHVE.LTDGB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.34

2.53

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

1.16

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.85

0.88

-0.04

Drawdowns

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHVE.L drawdown since its inception was -33.60%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHVE.L and TDGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHVE.LTDGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.60%

-37.43%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-5.06%

-3.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.52%

-13.67%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.08%

-18.93%

-7.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.66%

-1.86%

+1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.36%

-4.33%

-1.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.78%

+0.20%

Volatility

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc (VHVE.L) has a higher volatility of 3.64% compared to VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L) at 2.78%. This indicates that VHVE.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHVE.LTDGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.64%

2.78%

+0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.55%

8.06%

+1.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.20%

11.05%

+1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.56%

14.21%

+1.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.51%

16.79%

+0.72%

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHVE.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHVE.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison

VHVE.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TDGB.L
VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF
3.20%3.50%4.27%4.93%4.40%4.06%4.16%4.52%
VHVE.L
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF USD Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHVE.L and TDGB.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VHVE.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VHVE.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for TDGB.L.

VHVE.L tracks FTSE Developed, while TDGB.L tracks Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for VHVE.L and 0.38% for TDGB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHVE.L and TDGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer