VHT vs. TMRAF
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while TMRAF (Tomra Systems ASA) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.87%/yr vs 13.73%/yr for TMRAF. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
VHT vs. TMRAF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than TMRAF's -25.86% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed TMRAF with an annualized return of 9.87%, while TMRAF has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- -0.11%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- 4.78%
- 10Y*
- 9.87%
TMRAF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 10.49%
- YTD
- -25.86%
- 6M
- -21.73%
- 1Y
- -41.87%
- 3Y*
- -12.60%
- 5Y*
- -9.33%
- 10Y*
- 13.73%
VHT vs. TMRAF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.11% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | -25.86% | 7.13% | 13.87% | -32.05% | -27.02% | 50.97% | 51.54% | 46.27% | 48.12% | 82.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and TMRAF is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 10, 2007 | 0.08 |
The correlation between VHT and TMRAF shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. TMRAF — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
TMRAF
VHT vs. TMRAF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHT | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 0.81 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | -0.89 | +2.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | -1.62 | +5.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHT vs. TMRAF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum TMRAF drawdown of -71.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and TMRAF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -71.64% | +32.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -47.39% | +36.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -56.94% | +40.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -71.64% | +53.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -71.64% | +42.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -59.80% | +56.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.99% | -20.67% | +14.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.19% | 25.82% | -21.63% |
Volatility
VHT vs. TMRAF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 4.88%, while Tomra Systems ASA (TMRAF) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMRAF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | TMRAF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.88% | 19.08% | -14.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.46% | 40.28% | -29.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.70% | 52.03% | -37.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 58.61% | -43.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.97% | 49.87% | -32.90% |
Dividends
VHT vs. TMRAF - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than TMRAF's 0.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMRAF Tomra Systems ASA | 0.23% | 1.55% | 1.39% | 1.49% | 1.94% | 1.01% | 0.62% | 1.62% | 4.28% | 13.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and TMRAF have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMRAF has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs TMRAF's -71.64%.
VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs -0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and TMRAF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer