VHT vs. RSPH
VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and RSPH (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - VHT tracks the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index while RSPH tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 10.14%/yr vs 8.68%/yr for RSPH. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPH.
Performance
VHT vs. RSPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.03% return, which is significantly lower than RSPH's -0.02% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has outperformed RSPH with an annualized return of 10.14%, while RSPH has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.
VHT
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- 2.66%
- YTD
- -0.03%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 19.32%
- 3Y*
- 7.09%
- 5Y*
- 4.60%
- 10Y*
- 10.14%
RSPH
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 2.30%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 12.03%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
VHT vs. RSPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | -0.03% | 15.46% | 2.66% | 2.52% | -5.60% | 20.57% | 18.29% | 21.87% | 5.58% | 23.26% |
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | -0.02% | 9.52% | -0.94% | 3.95% | -9.40% | 23.19% | 18.83% | 25.48% | -0.66% | 23.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between VHT and RSPH is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2006 | 0.92 |
The correlation between VHT and RSPH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
VHT vs. RSPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VHT
RSPH
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
VHT
RSPH
Financial Services
VHT
RSPH
Industrials
VHT
RSPH
-
Technology
VHT
RSPH
-
Basic Materials
VHT
-
RSPH
-
Communication Services
VHT
-
RSPH
-
Consumer Cyclical
VHT
-
RSPH
-
Consumer Defensive
VHT
-
RSPH
-
Energy
VHT
-
RSPH
-
Real Estate
VHT
-
RSPH
-
Utilities
VHT
-
RSPH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VHT vs. RSPH — Risk / Return Rank
VHT
RSPH
VHT vs. RSPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VHT | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.14 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 1.11 | +0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | 2.72 | +1.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VHT vs. RSPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, roughly equal to the maximum RSPH drawdown of -40.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and RSPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VHT | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.12% | -40.49% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | -10.87% | +0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.91% | -17.13% | +0.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.71% | -21.95% | +4.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.85% | -30.44% | +1.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.20% | -4.26% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.98% | -6.14% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.22% | 4.43% | -0.21% |
Volatility
VHT vs. RSPH - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH) have volatilities of 5.02% and 5.08%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VHT | RSPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 5.08% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.49% | 10.86% | -0.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.72% | 15.87% | -1.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 16.34% | -1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.95% | 17.73% | -0.78% |
VHT vs. RSPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than RSPH's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
VHT vs. RSPH - Dividend Comparison
VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than RSPH's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RSPH Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF | 0.73% | 0.70% | 0.71% | 0.66% | 0.64% | 0.50% | 0.51% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.47% | 0.48% | 0.49% |
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF | 1.64% | 1.61% | 1.53% | 1.36% | 1.33% | 1.14% | 1.21% | 1.89% | 1.38% | 1.31% | 1.45% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VHT and RSPH have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RSPH has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to VHT (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs RSPH's -40.49%.
On 10-year performance, VHT leads with 10.14% vs 8.68% for RSPH. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VHT has performed better with a 10.14% return vs 8.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for RSPH.
VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.73% for RSPH.
VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while RSPH tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Health Care -SEC. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.40% for RSPH.
VHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VHT and RSPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer