VHT vs. QCLN

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

VHT (Vanguard Health Care ETF) and QCLN (First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - VHT is a Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while QCLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VHT returned 9.87%/yr vs 16.43%/yr for QCLN. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VHT charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.

Performance

VHT vs. QCLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHT achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN's 37.91% return. Over the past 10 years, VHT has underperformed QCLN with an annualized return of 9.87%, while QCLN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.43% annualized return.

VHT

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 4.51%
• YTD: -0.11%
• 6M: 0.45%
• 1Y: 16.49%
• 3Y*: 7.19%
• 5Y*: 4.78%
• 10Y*: 9.87%

QCLN

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: 37.91%
• 6M: 35.67%
• 1Y: 90.42%
• 3Y*: 6.19%
• 5Y*: -0.62%
• 10Y*: 16.43%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHT vs. QCLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	-0.11%	15.46%	2.66%	2.52%	-5.60%	20.57%	18.29%	21.87%	5.58%	23.26%
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	37.91%	31.81%	-18.86%	-10.02%	-30.37%	-3.21%	184.00%	42.65%	-12.38%	32.34%

Correlation

The correlation between VHT and QCLN is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2007	0.52

Over the past year, the correlation between VHT and QCLN has dropped to 0.22 - well below their long-term average of 0.52, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

VHT vs. QCLN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	VHT	QCLN
Healthcare	100.0%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	1.4%
Industrials	0.0%	24.8%
Technology	0.0%	47.6%
Basic Materials	-	7.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	10.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	8.1%

Return for Risk

VHT vs. QCLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHT

VHT Risk / Return Rank: 34
VHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
VHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
VHT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
VHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
VHT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

QCLN

QCLN Risk / Return Rank: 83
QCLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QCLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QCLN Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QCLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
QCLN Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHT vs. QCLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	VHT	QCLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.09	2.46	-1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.89	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.37	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.53	5.51	-3.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	18.21	-14.40

VHT vs. QCLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHT Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the QCLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHT and QCLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

VHT vs. QCLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHT drawdown since its inception was -39.12%, smaller than the maximum QCLN drawdown of -76.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHT and QCLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	VHT	QCLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.12%	-76.18%	+37.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.40%	-16.40%	+6.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.91%	-56.08%	+39.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.71%	-69.49%	+51.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.85%	-71.73%	+42.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.28%	-28.75%	+25.47%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.99%	-43.42%	+37.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.19%	4.95%	-0.76%

Volatility

VHT vs. QCLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Health Care ETF (VHT) is 4.88%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund (QCLN) has a volatility of 16.96%. This indicates that VHT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	VHT	QCLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.88%	16.96%	-12.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.46%	28.95%	-18.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.70%	36.71%	-22.01%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.01%	38.33%	-23.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.97%	35.10%	-18.13%

VHT vs. QCLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

VHT vs. QCLN - Dividend Comparison

VHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than QCLN's 0.16% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QCLN First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index Fund	0.16%	0.25%	0.87%	0.76%	0.33%	0.01%	0.30%	0.85%	1.03%	0.45%	1.24%	0.72%
VHT Vanguard Health Care ETF	1.64%	1.61%	1.53%	1.36%	1.33%	1.14%	1.21%	1.89%	1.38%	1.31%	1.45%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both VHT and QCLN in my portfolio?

VHT and QCLN have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, VHT or QCLN?

QCLN has higher volatility (16.96%) compared to VHT (4.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHT dropped -39.12% vs QCLN's -76.18%.

Which ETF is better, VHT or QCLN?

On 10-year performance, QCLN leads with 16.43% vs 9.87% for VHT. On fees, VHT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VHT has been the lower-risk option at 4.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, VHT or QCLN?

Over the 10-year period, QCLN has performed better with a 16.43% return vs 9.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, VHT or QCLN?

VHT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, VHT or QCLN?

VHT has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.16% for QCLN.

What is the main difference between VHT and QCLN?

VHT is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while QCLN is Alternative Energy Equities. VHT tracks MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index, while QCLN tracks NASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for VHT and 0.60% for QCLN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QCLN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.