PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHIAX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHIAX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund (VHIAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHIAX achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 17.66% return. Over the past 10 years, VHIAX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 19.24%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 21.79% annualized return.


VHIAX

1D
0.51%
1M
5.67%
YTD
7.68%
6M
6.38%
1Y
24.08%
3Y*
25.61%
5Y*
14.14%
10Y*
19.24%

FBGRX

1D
0.86%
1M
8.31%
YTD
17.66%
6M
18.83%
1Y
45.12%
3Y*
32.21%
5Y*
16.60%
10Y*
21.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHIAX vs. FBGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHIAX
JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund
7.68%15.50%39.19%39.81%-30.24%21.60%53.26%35.92%-1.52%35.19%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
17.66%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%36.01%

Correlation

The correlation between VHIAX and FBGRX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 1999

0.93

The correlation between VHIAX and FBGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHIAX vs. FBGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHIAX
VHIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
VHIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
VHIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHIAX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund (VHIAX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHIAXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

2.67

-1.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

3.42

-1.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.45

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

3.62

-2.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.10

15.38

-10.29

VHIAX vs. FBGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHIAX and FBGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHIAXFBGRXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

2.67

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.67

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.92

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.68

-0.32

Drawdowns

VHIAX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHIAX drawdown since its inception was -85.49%, which is greater than FBGRX's maximum drawdown of -58.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHIAX and FBGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHIAXFBGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.49%

-58.64%

-26.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.76%

-12.65%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.38%

-27.07%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.25%

-43.08%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

-43.08%

+7.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.13%

-12.53%

-27.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

2.98%

+1.97%

Volatility

VHIAX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund (VHIAX) is 3.85%, while Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that VHIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHIAXFBGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.14%

-0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.78%

12.99%

-1.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.59%

17.46%

-1.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.39%

24.88%

-2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.19%

23.69%

-1.50%

VHIAX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHIAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHIAX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

VHIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.79%, more than FBGRX's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.61%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%
VHIAX
JPMorgan Growth Advantage Fund
11.79%12.70%12.63%0.64%0.43%15.55%10.33%9.95%9.93%4.25%0.00%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VHIAX and FBGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FBGRX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to VHIAX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHIAX dropped -85.49% vs FBGRX's -58.64%.

FBGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHIAX and FBGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer