PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VHCAX vs. BNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VHCAX vs. BNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Admiral Shares (VHCAX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VHCAX achieves a 20.09% return, which is significantly higher than BNDX's 0.37% return. Over the past 10 years, VHCAX has outperformed BNDX with an annualized return of 16.65%, while BNDX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.65% annualized return.


VHCAX

1D
-4.24%
1M
1.98%
YTD
20.09%
6M
20.90%
1Y
47.66%
3Y*
24.93%
5Y*
13.49%
10Y*
16.65%

BNDX

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.16%
YTD
0.37%
6M
0.55%
1Y
1.86%
3Y*
4.01%
5Y*
0.25%
10Y*
1.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VHCAX vs. BNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VHCAX
Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Admiral Shares
20.09%25.83%14.07%25.63%-17.56%20.92%22.83%27.30%-3.71%28.37%
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
0.37%2.86%3.57%8.77%-12.76%-2.29%4.65%7.87%2.81%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between VHCAX and BNDX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2013

0.01

Over the past year, VHCAX and BNDX have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.

VHCAX vs. BNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
VHCAX
BNDX

Technology

33.1%

-

Healthcare

24.9%
0.0%

Industrials

10.7%
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.8%

-

Financial Services

8.2%
0.0%

Communication Services

6.5%
0.0%

Energy

2.2%
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.4%

-

Real Estate

0.1%
0.0%

Utilities

-

0.0%

Technology

VHCAX
33.1%
BNDX

-

Healthcare

VHCAX
24.9%
BNDX
0.0%

Industrials

VHCAX
10.7%
BNDX
0.0%

Consumer Cyclical

VHCAX
9.8%
BNDX

-

Financial Services

VHCAX
8.2%
BNDX
0.0%

Communication Services

VHCAX
6.5%
BNDX
0.0%

Energy

VHCAX
2.2%
BNDX
0.0%

Consumer Defensive

VHCAX
0.9%
BNDX

-

Basic Materials

VHCAX
0.4%
BNDX

-

Real Estate

VHCAX
0.1%
BNDX
0.0%

Utilities

VHCAX

-

BNDX
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VHCAX vs. BNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VHCAX
VHCAX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VHCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VHCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
VHCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
VHCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VHCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

BNDX
BNDX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
BNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VHCAX vs. BNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Admiral Shares (VHCAX) and Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VHCAXBNDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.10

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.99

0.64

+3.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.82

1.79

+16.02

VHCAX vs. BNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VHCAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is higher than the BNDX Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VHCAX and BNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VHCAXBNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

0.54

+2.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.05

+0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

0.41

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.60

-0.01

Drawdowns

VHCAX vs. BNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VHCAX drawdown since its inception was -54.27%, which is greater than BNDX's maximum drawdown of -16.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VHCAX and BNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VHCAXBNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.27%

-16.23%

-38.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.42%

-2.93%

-9.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.92%

-2.93%

-20.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.55%

-15.86%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.78%

-16.23%

-17.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.43%

-1.65%

-2.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-3.08%

-5.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.04%

+1.74%

Volatility

VHCAX vs. BNDX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Admiral Shares (VHCAX) has a higher volatility of 7.28% compared to Vanguard Total International Bond ETF (BNDX) at 1.47%. This indicates that VHCAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VHCAXBNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.28%

1.47%

+5.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.43%

2.91%

+11.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.54%

3.43%

+14.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.90%

4.88%

+15.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

4.09%

+16.27%

VHCAX vs. BNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VHCAX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDX's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

VHCAX vs. BNDX - Dividend Comparison

VHCAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.09%, more than BNDX's 4.50% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNDX
Vanguard Total International Bond ETF
4.50%4.39%4.18%4.42%1.51%3.74%1.11%3.40%3.01%2.23%1.89%1.63%
VHCAX
Vanguard Capital Opportunity Fund Admiral Shares
8.09%9.71%8.24%2.40%9.35%10.55%9.19%6.48%12.23%3.87%5.74%5.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


VHCAX and BNDX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VHCAX has higher volatility (7.28%) compared to BNDX (1.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VHCAX dropped -54.27% vs BNDX's -16.23%.

VHCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VHCAX and BNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer