VGVT vs. PDBC
VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) and PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGVT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard, while PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. VGVT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PDBC.
Performance
VGVT vs. PDBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than PDBC's 34.72% return.
VGVT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDBC
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -3.98%
- YTD
- 34.72%
- 6M
- 34.37%
- 1Y
- 44.52%
- 3Y*
- 14.06%
- 5Y*
- 12.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.55%
VGVT vs. PDBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 0.15% | 3.28% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 34.72% | 3.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGVT and PDBC is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | -0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGVT vs. PDBC — Risk / Return Rank
VGVT
PDBC
VGVT vs. PDBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGVT | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.40 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.23 | +0.96 |
Drawdowns
VGVT vs. PDBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, smaller than the maximum PDBC drawdown of -49.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and PDBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGVT | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -49.52% | +46.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.95% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.63% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -40.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -5.61% | +3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -23.20% | +22.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility
VGVT vs. PDBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGVT | PDBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.27% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.82% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 18.64% | -15.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 19.12% | -15.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 17.78% | -14.56% |
VGVT vs. PDBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than PDBC's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGVT vs. PDBC - Dividend Comparison
VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than PDBC's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.85% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 3.98% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGVT and PDBC have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGVT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGVT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
VGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 2.85% for PDBC.
VGVT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while PDBC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.58% for PDBC.
Find the right allocation for VGVT and PDBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer