VGVT vs. IBTM
VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) and IBTM (iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. VGVT is actively managed, while IBTM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. VGVT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTM.
Performance
VGVT vs. IBTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a 0.29% return, which is significantly higher than IBTM's -0.45% return.
VGVT
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- YTD
- 0.29%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBTM
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.49%
- YTD
- -0.45%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- 1Y
- 2.87%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGVT vs. IBTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 0.29% | 3.56% |
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | -0.45% | 3.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGVT and IBTM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGVT vs. IBTM — Risk / Return Rank
VGVT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBTM
VGVT vs. IBTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF (IBTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGVT | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.12 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.88 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 2.32 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGVT vs. IBTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, smaller than the maximum IBTM drawdown of -13.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and IBTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGVT | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -13.60% | +10.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -3.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.57% | -2.34% | +0.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.73% | -4.78% | +4.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.24% | — |
Volatility
VGVT vs. IBTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGVT | IBTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.24% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24% | 4.04% | -0.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.24% | 7.52% | -4.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.24% | 7.52% | -4.28% |
VGVT vs. IBTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than IBTM's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGVT vs. IBTM - Dividend Comparison
VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, which matches IBTM's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTM iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Treasury ETF | 3.95% | 3.87% | 3.96% | 3.39% | 1.38% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 3.98% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGVT and IBTM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IBTM is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBTM is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for VGVT.
VGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 3.95% for IBTM.
They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.07% for IBTM.
Find the right allocation for VGVT and IBTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer