PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGVT vs. DFCF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGVT vs. DFCF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than DFCF's -0.07% return.


VGVT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.33%
6M
-0.37%
YTD
-0.14%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFCF

1D
-0.33%
1M
-0.70%
6M
-0.28%
YTD
-0.07%
1Y
4.03%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGVT vs. DFCF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VGVT and DFCF is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.87

The correlation between VGVT and DFCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGVT vs. DFCF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGVT
VGVT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

DFCF
DFCF Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
DFCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
DFCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFCF Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGVT vs. DFCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGVTDFCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

1.45

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

4.07

-0.76

VGVT vs. DFCF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the DFCF Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGVT and DFCF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGVT vs. DFCF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, smaller than the maximum DFCF drawdown of -19.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and DFCF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGVTDFCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-19.56%

+16.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-2.79%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-1.90%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-7.88%

+7.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.99%

+0.06%

Volatility

VGVT vs. DFCF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) is 1.02%, while Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF (DFCF) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that VGVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGVTDFCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

1.33%

-0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

3.11%

-0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

3.97%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.25%

6.42%

-3.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.25%

6.42%

-3.17%

VGVT vs. DFCF - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than DFCF's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGVT vs. DFCF - Dividend Comparison

VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, which matches DFCF's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
DFCF
Dimensional Core Fixed Income ETF
4.38%4.48%4.61%4.51%3.27%0.16%
VGVT
Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF
4.38%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGVT and DFCF have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFCF has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to VGVT (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGVT dropped -2.77% vs DFCF's -19.56%.

On 1-year performance, DFCF leads with 4.03% vs 3.46% for VGVT. On fees, VGVT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, VGVT has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, DFCF has performed better with a 4.03% return vs 3.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGVT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.17% for DFCF.

VGVT and DFCF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 4.38%.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.17% for DFCF.

VGVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGVT and DFCF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer