VGVT vs. COMT
VGVT (Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGVT is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Vanguard, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.37, they often move in opposite directions. VGVT charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
VGVT vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 37.50% return.
VGVT
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 0.15%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 37.50%
- 6M
- 36.36%
- 1Y
- 45.51%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.79%
VGVT vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 0.15% | 3.28% |
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 37.50% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGVT and COMT is -0.37, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | -0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGVT vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
VGVT
COMT
VGVT vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGVT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.14 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.47 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | 0.20 | +0.99 |
Drawdowns
VGVT vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGVT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.77% | -51.89% | +49.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.71% | -6.30% | +4.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.67% | -24.06% | +23.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.40% | — |
Volatility
VGVT vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGVT | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 18.88% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.22% | 21.36% | -18.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 21.07% | -17.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.22% | 18.89% | -15.67% |
VGVT vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGVT vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than COMT's 5.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF | 5.63% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
VGVT Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF | 3.98% | 2.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGVT and COMT have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGVT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGVT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.63%, compared with 3.98% for VGVT.
VGVT is categorized as Intermediate Core Bond, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.48% for COMT.
Find the right allocation for VGVT and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer