PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGVT vs. BFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGVT vs. BFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGVT achieves a -0.14% return, which is significantly lower than BFIX's 0.78% return.


VGVT

1D
-0.19%
1M
-0.33%
6M
-0.37%
YTD
-0.14%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BFIX

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.21%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.78%
1Y
3.26%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGVT vs. BFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between VGVT and BFIX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGVT vs. BFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGVT
VGVT Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
VGVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGVT Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
VGVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGVT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

BFIX
BFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
BFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
BFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
BFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
BFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGVT vs. BFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) and Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGVTBFIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.22

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

3.01

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

7.06

-3.76

VGVT vs. BFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGVT Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is comparable to the BFIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGVT and BFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGVT vs. BFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGVT drawdown since its inception was -2.77%, smaller than the maximum BFIX drawdown of -8.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGVT and BFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGVTBFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-8.54%

+5.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.77%

-1.09%

-1.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-0.89%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

-2.96%

+2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

0.46%

+0.59%

Volatility

VGVT vs. BFIX - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF (VGVT) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to Build Bond Innovation ETF (BFIX) at 0.49%. This indicates that VGVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGVTBFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

0.49%

+0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

1.51%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.24%

2.85%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.25%

4.73%

-1.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.25%

4.73%

-1.48%

VGVT vs. BFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGVT has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than BFIX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

VGVT vs. BFIX - Dividend Comparison

VGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than BFIX's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BFIX
Build Bond Innovation ETF
3.58%3.73%4.38%4.30%1.58%
VGVT
Vanguard Government Securities Active ETF
4.38%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGVT and BFIX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGVT has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to BFIX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGVT dropped -2.77% vs BFIX's -8.54%.

On 1-year performance, VGVT leads with 3.46% vs 3.26% for BFIX. On fees, VGVT is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, BFIX has been the lower-risk option at 0.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, VGVT has performed better with a 3.46% return vs 3.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGVT is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for BFIX.

VGVT has the higher dividend yield at 4.38%, compared with 3.58% for BFIX.

They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Build. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for VGVT and 0.45% for BFIX.

BFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGVT and BFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer