PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VGTY.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

VGTY.DE is traded in EUR, while IBTM.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTM.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGTY.DE achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than IBTM.L's 0.95% return.


VGTY.DE

1D
0.08%
1M
0.76%
YTD
0.80%
6M
0.01%
1Y
1.03%
3Y*
-0.33%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*

IBTM.L

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.34%
YTD
0.95%
6M
0.38%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
1.10%
5Y*
0.88%
10Y*
1.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGTY.DE
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
0.80%-5.99%6.16%0.04%-6.98%5.64%-2.09%9.36%5.00%-2.11%
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.95%-3.06%7.51%0.59%-9.31%5.08%0.67%13.01%6.02%-2.31%

Correlation

The correlation between VGTY.DE and IBTM.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.87

The correlation between VGTY.DE and IBTM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGTY.DE
VGTY.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
VGTY.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGTY.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGTY.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
VGTY.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGTY.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTM.L
IBTM.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VGTY.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGTY.DEIBTM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.11

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

0.80

-0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

2.01

-1.40

VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGTY.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.19, which is lower than the IBTM.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGTY.DE and IBTM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGTY.DEIBTM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

0.60

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.09

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.46

-0.33

Drawdowns

VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGTY.DE drawdown since its inception was -17.97%, smaller than the maximum IBTM.L drawdown of -20.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGTY.DE and IBTM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGTY.DEIBTM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-20.17%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.08%

-4.45%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.23%

-10.24%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.16%

-15.40%

+2.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.45%

-11.93%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-8.76%

-0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

1.76%

-0.09%

Volatility

VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing (VGTY.DE) is 0.85%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTM.L) has a volatility of 1.50%. This indicates that VGTY.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGTY.DEIBTM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.85%

1.50%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.73%

4.34%

-0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.44%

6.01%

-0.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.99%

9.36%

-1.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.63%

9.20%

-1.57%

VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGTY.DE has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTM.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGTY.DE vs. IBTM.L - Dividend Comparison

VGTY.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than IBTM.L's 5.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTM.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 7-10yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
5.82%5.55%5.00%3.93%2.34%1.57%2.13%3.25%3.07%2.64%2.40%3.01%
VGTY.DE
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Distributing
3.65%3.99%3.65%3.21%2.05%0.99%1.48%2.10%1.94%0.26%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGTY.DE and IBTM.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VGTY.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VGTY.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTM.L.

VGTY.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index, while IBTM.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 7-10 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for VGTY.DE and 0.07% for IBTM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGTY.DE and IBTM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer