VGSR vs. GQRE
VGSR (Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF) and GQRE (FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund) are both REIT funds. VGSR is actively managed, while GQRE is passively managed. Over the past year, VGSR returned 11.85% vs 12.75% for GQRE. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.
Performance
VGSR vs. GQRE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGSR achieves a 9.30% return, which is significantly higher than GQRE's 8.29% return.
VGSR
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 9.92%
- 1Y
- 11.85%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GQRE
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 9.03%
- 1Y
- 12.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 3.85%
VGSR vs. GQRE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
VGSR Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF | 9.30% | 6.31% | 5.59% | 7.01% |
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 8.29% | 8.27% | 6.09% | 6.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGSR and GQRE is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2023 | 0.91 |
The correlation between VGSR and GQRE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGSR vs. GQRE — Risk / Return Rank
VGSR
GQRE
VGSR vs. GQRE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF (VGSR) and FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGSR | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.20 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.26 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.06 | 4.80 | -0.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGSR | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | 1.10 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.13 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 0.30 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
VGSR vs. GQRE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGSR drawdown since its inception was -18.33%, smaller than the maximum GQRE drawdown of -41.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGSR and GQRE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGSR | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.33% | -41.87% | +23.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.74% | -10.15% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.14% | -2.58% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.95% | -9.23% | +5.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 2.66% | +0.27% |
Volatility
VGSR vs. GQRE - Volatility Comparison
Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF (VGSR) has a higher volatility of 3.95% compared to FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund (GQRE) at 3.56%. This indicates that VGSR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GQRE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGSR | GQRE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.95% | 3.56% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.67% | 8.80% | +0.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 11.66% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 16.46% | -1.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.11% | 17.66% | -2.55% |
VGSR vs. GQRE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VGSR and GQRE have an expense ratio of 0.45%.
Dividends
VGSR vs. GQRE - Dividend Comparison
VGSR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than GQRE's 4.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GQRE FlexShares Global Quality Real Estate Index Fund | 4.32% | 4.75% | 3.77% | 2.91% | 2.56% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 4.29% | 3.22% | 1.97% | 4.16% | 2.32% |
VGSR Vert Global Sustainable Real Estate ETF | 3.42% | 3.41% | 3.79% | 2.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, VGSR and GQRE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
VGSR has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to GQRE (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGSR dropped -18.33% vs GQRE's -41.87%.
On 1-year performance, GQRE leads with 12.75% vs 11.85% for VGSR. Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. On volatility, GQRE has been the lower-risk option at 3.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GQRE has performed better with a 12.75% return vs 11.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGSR and GQRE have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.
GQRE has the higher dividend yield at 4.32%, compared with 3.42% for VGSR.
They also come from different issuers: Vert and Northern Trust.
GQRE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VGSR and GQRE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer