VGMS vs. VTV
VGMS (Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF) and VTV (Vanguard Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGMS is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Vanguard, while VTV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. VGMS is actively managed, while VTV is passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGMS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for VTV.
Performance
VGMS vs. VTV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGMS achieves a 1.06% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return.
VGMS
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.06%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VTV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 4.23%
- YTD
- 12.30%
- 6M
- 13.12%
- 1Y
- 26.25%
- 3Y*
- 18.28%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
VGMS vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 1.06% | 5.44% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 12.30% | 11.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGMS and VTV is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGMS vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank
VGMS
VTV
VGMS vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF (VGMS) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGMS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.81 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.75 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.11 | 0.51 | +1.60 |
Drawdowns
VGMS vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGMS drawdown since its inception was -2.46%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGMS and VTV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGMS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.46% | -59.27% | +56.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -17.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.39% | 0.00% | -0.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.31% | -7.87% | +7.56% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.68% | — |
Volatility
VGMS vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGMS | VTV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 10.11% | -6.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 13.88% | -10.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.21% | 16.67% | -13.46% |
VGMS vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGMS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGMS vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison
VGMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGMS Vanguard Multi-Sector Income Bond ETF | 5.16% | 2.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VTV Vanguard Value ETF | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.31% | 2.46% | 2.52% | 2.15% | 2.56% | 2.50% | 2.73% | 2.29% | 2.44% | 2.60% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGMS and VTV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VTV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VTV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGMS.
VGMS has the higher dividend yield at 5.16%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.
VGMS is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGMS and 0.04% for VTV.
Find the right allocation for VGMS and VTV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer