PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGLT vs. VTV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGLT vs. VTV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than VTV's 12.30% return. Over the past 10 years, VGLT has underperformed VTV with an annualized return of -1.10%, while VTV has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.


VGLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.71%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
-0.72%
5Y*
-5.30%
10Y*
-1.10%

VTV

1D
0.01%
1M
4.23%
YTD
12.30%
6M
13.12%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
12.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGLT vs. VTV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
-0.41%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%-1.54%8.64%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
12.30%15.27%15.95%9.32%-2.09%26.53%2.33%25.66%-5.47%17.15%

Correlation

The correlation between VGLT and VTV is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2009

-0.27

The correlation between VGLT and VTV shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (all time) to 0.24 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGLT vs. VTV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

VTV
VTV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
VTV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VTV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGLT vs. VTV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VGLTVTVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.47

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.75

4.15

-3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

15.69

-13.73

VGLT vs. VTV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the VTV Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGLT and VTV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VGLTVTVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

2.61

-2.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

0.81

-1.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

0.75

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.51

-0.33

Drawdowns

VGLT vs. VTV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, smaller than the maximum VTV drawdown of -59.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and VTV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGLTVTVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-59.27%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-6.35%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-14.52%

-3.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

-17.04%

-23.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

-36.78%

-9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.83%

0.00%

-36.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.06%

-7.87%

-7.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

1.68%

+1.00%

Volatility

VGLT vs. VTV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.52%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGLTVTVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.59%

2.52%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.94%

7.55%

-1.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.88%

10.11%

-1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.58%

13.88%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.81%

16.67%

-2.86%

VGLT vs. VTV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than VTV's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGLT vs. VTV - Dividend Comparison

VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, more than VTV's 1.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.61%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%
VTV
Vanguard Value ETF
1.86%2.05%2.31%2.46%2.52%2.15%2.56%2.50%2.73%2.29%2.44%2.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGLT and VTV have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGLT has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to VTV (2.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs VTV's -59.27%.

On 10-year performance, VTV leads with 12.48% vs -1.10% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VTV has performed better with a 12.48% return vs -1.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.04% for VTV.

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 1.86% for VTV.

VGLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while VTV is Large Cap Value Equities. VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while VTV tracks CRSP US Large Cap Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 0.04% for VTV.

VTV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGLT and VTV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer