VGLT vs. IBTE
VGLT (Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF) and IBTE (iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - VGLT tracks the Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index while IBTE tracks the ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. Both are passively managed. VGLT charges 0.03%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for IBTE.
Performance
VGLT vs. IBTE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VGLT
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- -1.68%
- 1Y
- 5.25%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -5.30%
- 10Y*
- -1.10%
IBTE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGLT vs. IBTE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | -1.00% |
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGLT vs. IBTE — Risk / Return Rank
VGLT
IBTE
VGLT vs. IBTE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF (IBTE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGLT | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.96 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGLT | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.19 | — | — |
Drawdowns
VGLT vs. IBTE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, which is greater than IBTE's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and IBTE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGLT | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.18% | 0.00% | -46.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.98% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.83% | 0.00% | -36.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.06% | 0.00% | -15.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.68% | — | — |
Volatility
VGLT vs. IBTE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGLT | IBTE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.94% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.88% | 0.00% | +8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.58% | 0.00% | +14.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 0.00% | +13.81% |
VGLT vs. IBTE - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTE's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VGLT vs. IBTE - Dividend Comparison
VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.61%, while IBTE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTE iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Treasury ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | 4.61% | 4.44% | 4.33% | 3.33% | 2.84% | 1.82% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.71% | 2.55% | 2.69% | 3.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTE.
VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.61%, compared with 0.00% for IBTE.
VGLT tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index, while IBTE tracks ICE 2024 Maturity US Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 0.07% for IBTE.
Find the right allocation for VGLT and IBTE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer