PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VGLT vs. AVUV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VGLT vs. AVUV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGLT achieves a 0.03% return, which is significantly lower than AVUV's 22.73% return.


VGLT

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.30%
YTD
0.03%
6M
0.49%
1Y
3.29%
3Y*
-0.30%
5Y*
-5.52%
10Y*
-1.21%

AVUV

1D
0.96%
1M
5.96%
YTD
22.73%
6M
19.51%
1Y
40.08%
3Y*
19.24%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGLT vs. AVUV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
0.03%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%-3.34%
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
22.73%7.44%9.28%22.82%-4.91%42.20%6.43%8.54%

Correlation

The correlation between VGLT and AVUV is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

-0.12

The correlation between VGLT and AVUV shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.20 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VGLT vs. AVUV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

AVUV
AVUV Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AVUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AVUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVUV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGLT vs. AVUV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) and Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


VGLTAVUVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.39

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.47

5.06

-4.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.19

15.09

-13.90

VGLT vs. AVUV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGLT Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the AVUV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGLT and AVUV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGLT vs. AVUV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGLT drawdown since its inception was -46.18%, smaller than the maximum AVUV drawdown of -49.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGLT and AVUV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VGLTAVUVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.18%

-49.42%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.01%

-7.95%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.68%

-28.79%

+11.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.98%

-28.79%

-12.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.55%

0.00%

-36.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.09%

-7.91%

-7.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.67%

+0.11%

Volatility

VGLT vs. AVUV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) is 2.69%, while Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF (AVUV) has a volatility of 4.53%. This indicates that VGLT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVUV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VGLTAVUVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

4.53%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.09%

11.34%

-5.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.78%

17.63%

-8.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.57%

22.75%

-8.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.82%

28.26%

-14.44%

VGLT vs. AVUV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGLT has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is lower than AVUV's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VGLT vs. AVUV - Dividend Comparison

VGLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.59%, more than AVUV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVUV
Avantis US Small Cap Value ETF
1.61%1.58%1.61%1.65%1.74%1.28%1.21%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.59%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


VGLT and AVUV have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVUV has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to VGLT (2.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VGLT dropped -46.18% vs AVUV's -49.42%.

On 5-year performance, AVUV leads with 11.57% vs -5.52% for VGLT. On fees, VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VGLT has been the lower-risk option at 2.69%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVUV has performed better with a 11.57% return vs -5.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VGLT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AVUV.

VGLT has the higher dividend yield at 4.59%, compared with 1.61% for AVUV.

VGLT is categorized as Government Bonds, while AVUV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.03% for VGLT and 0.25% for AVUV.

AVUV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGLT and AVUV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer