PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026
Documentation

VGH.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged) and XUU.TO (iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGH.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index (CAD-hedged), while XUU.TO is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Total Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGH.TO returned 11.08%/yr vs 15.22%/yr for XUU.TO. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. VGH.TO charges 0.31%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for XUU.TO.

Performance

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VGH.TO achieves a 7.91% return, which is significantly lower than XUU.TO's 13.79% return. Over the past 10 years, VGH.TO has underperformed XUU.TO with an annualized return of 11.08%, while XUU.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 15.22% annualized return.

VGH.TO

1D
0.48%
1M
0.85%
6M
5.43%
YTD
7.91%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
13.14%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
11.08%

XUU.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
0.91%
6M
10.41%
YTD
13.79%
1Y
24.73%
3Y*
21.90%
5Y*
14.73%
10Y*
15.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VGH.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged		7.91%11.44%15.35%12.77%-11.08%22.47%12.97%27.74%-4.59%21.47%
XUU.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF		13.79%11.25%34.07%23.11%-13.53%25.94%16.26%23.78%2.43%12.80%

Correlation

The correlation between VGH.TO and XUU.TO is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2015

0.72

The correlation between VGH.TO and XUU.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
VGH.TO
XUU.TO

Technology

29.0%
37.0%

Financial Services

19.9%
11.4%

Healthcare

16.6%
8.6%

Industrials

11.3%
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

9.3%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

4.4%
10.0%

Basic Materials

3.3%
1.9%

Energy

3.2%
3.3%

Utilities

2.9%
2.2%

Communication Services

0.5%
10.0%

Real Estate

-

2.3%

Technology

VGH.TO
29.0%
XUU.TO
37.0%

Financial Services

VGH.TO
19.9%
XUU.TO
11.4%

Healthcare

VGH.TO
16.6%
XUU.TO
8.6%

Industrials

VGH.TO
11.3%
XUU.TO
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

VGH.TO
9.3%
XUU.TO
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

VGH.TO
4.4%
XUU.TO
10.0%

Basic Materials

VGH.TO
3.3%
XUU.TO
1.9%

Energy

VGH.TO
3.2%
XUU.TO
3.3%

Utilities

VGH.TO
2.9%
XUU.TO
2.2%

Communication Services

VGH.TO
0.5%
XUU.TO
10.0%

Real Estate

VGH.TO

-

XUU.TO
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged

iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF

Often compared with VGH.TO:
VGH.TO vs. XDIV.TOVGH.TO vs. SCHDVGH.TO vs. VDY.TOVGH.TO vs. TQCD.TOVGH.TO vs. XDUH.TOVGH.TO vs. VCN.TOVGH.TO vs. VGG.TO
Often compared with XUU.TO:
XUU.TO vs. XUS.TOXUU.TO vs. VUN.TOXUU.TO vs. XAW.TOXUU.TO vs. XUU-U.TOXUU.TO vs. XIC.TOXUU.TO vs. VTIXUU.TO vs. VOO

Return for Risk

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
VGH.TO
VGH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
VGH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
XUU.TO
XUU.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
XUU.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
XUU.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) and iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

VGH.TOXUU.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.50
1.96

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.21
2.72

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.36

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

2.82

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

10.55

-3.38

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VGH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the XUU.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VGH.TO and XUU.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VGH.TO drawdown since its inception was -32.82%, which is greater than XUU.TO's maximum drawdown of -28.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGH.TO and XUU.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

VGH.TOXUU.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.82%

-28.22%

-4.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-8.80%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.16%

-19.70%

+4.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.34%

-23.40%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.82%

-28.22%

-4.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.37%

-1.18%

+0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.64%

-4.12%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.12%

2.35%

-0.23%

Volatility

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged (VGH.TO) is 1.98%, while iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF (XUU.TO) has a volatility of 3.17%. This indicates that VGH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XUU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

VGH.TOXUU.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

3.17%

-1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.52%

9.92%

-2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.13%

12.66%

-2.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.19%

15.55%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.72%

16.58%

-0.86%

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

VGH.TO has a 0.31% expense ratio, which is higher than XUU.TO's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

VGH.TO vs. XUU.TO - Dividend Comparison

VGH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than XUU.TO's 1.02% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VGH.TO
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF CAD-Hedged		1.07%1.15%1.28%1.34%1.38%1.22%1.21%1.23%1.58%1.39%1.63%1.81%
XUU.TO
iShares Core S&P U.S. Total Market Index ETF		1.02%1.16%1.02%1.22%1.38%1.01%1.33%1.68%1.74%1.49%1.65%1.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

VGH.TO and XUU.TO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XUU.TO is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XUU.TO is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for VGH.TO.

VGH.TO is categorized as Dividend, while XUU.TO is Large Cap Blend Equities. VGH.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index (CAD-hedged), while XUU.TO tracks S&P Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.31% for VGH.TO and 0.07% for XUU.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VGH.TO and XUU.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer