VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO
VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) and ZWU.TO (BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while ZWU.TO is a Utilities Equities fund actively managed by BMO. VGG.TO is passively managed, while ZWU.TO is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGG.TO returned 13.46%/yr vs 6.08%/yr for ZWU.TO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGG.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ZWU.TO.
Performance
VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly lower than ZWU.TO's 10.15% return. Over the past 10 years, VGG.TO has outperformed ZWU.TO with an annualized return of 13.46%, while ZWU.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.08% annualized return.
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
ZWU.TO
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.34%
- YTD
- 10.15%
- 6M
- 9.37%
- 1Y
- 15.17%
- 3Y*
- 10.66%
- 5Y*
- 6.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.08%
VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 8.57% | 8.61% | 26.49% | 11.58% | -4.21% | 22.23% | 12.67% | 23.32% | 5.20% | 13.99% |
ZWU.TO BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF | 10.15% | 13.18% | 10.97% | -2.79% | -3.89% | 15.80% | -7.09% | 23.48% | -5.73% | 5.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGG.TO and ZWU.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2013 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between VGG.TO and ZWU.TO has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
-
Financial Services
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
-
Healthcare
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
-
Industrials
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
-
Energy
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
Basic Materials
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
-
Utilities
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
Communication Services
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
Real Estate
VGG.TO
-
ZWU.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VGG.TO
ZWU.TO
VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGG.TO | ZWU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.36 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 3.13 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 8.85 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGG.TO | ZWU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 2.01 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.61 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.43 | +0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.42 | +0.56 |
Drawdowns
VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, smaller than the maximum ZWU.TO drawdown of -37.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and ZWU.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGG.TO | ZWU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.58% | -37.41% | +12.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -4.86% | -2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -12.85% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -23.36% | +4.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.58% | -37.41% | +12.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.31% | +2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -5.38% | +2.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.73% | +0.16% |
Volatility
VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) is 2.59%, while BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF (ZWU.TO) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that VGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZWU.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGG.TO | ZWU.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.81% | -0.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 6.30% | +1.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 7.59% | +2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 10.47% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 14.18% | +0.79% |
VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGG.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ZWU.TO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGG.TO vs. ZWU.TO - Dividend Comparison
VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than ZWU.TO's 7.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
ZWU.TO BMO Covered Call Utilities ETF | 7.09% | 7.59% | 7.96% | 8.54% | 8.35% | 7.43% | 7.94% | 6.29% | 6.84% | 6.46% | 6.77% | 7.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGG.TO and ZWU.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGG.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ZWU.TO.
VGG.TO is categorized as Dividend, while ZWU.TO is Utilities Equities. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGG.TO and 0.65% for ZWU.TO.
Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and ZWU.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer