VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO
VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) and ZEB.TO (BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while ZEB.TO is a Financials Equities fund tracking the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGG.TO returned 13.63%/yr vs 16.60%/yr for ZEB.TO. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGG.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ZEB.TO.
Performance
VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than ZEB.TO's 25.33% return. Over the past 10 years, VGG.TO has underperformed ZEB.TO with an annualized return of 13.63%, while ZEB.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 16.60% annualized return.
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 20.88%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
ZEB.TO
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 9.87%
- YTD
- 25.33%
- 6M
- 26.07%
- 1Y
- 67.94%
- 3Y*
- 34.82%
- 5Y*
- 19.53%
- 10Y*
- 16.60%
VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 9.29% | 8.61% | 26.49% | 11.58% | -4.21% | 22.23% | 12.67% | 23.32% | 5.20% | 13.99% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 25.33% | 43.43% | 24.58% | 10.87% | -10.38% | 39.38% | 3.52% | 16.06% | -8.85% | 14.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGG.TO and ZEB.TO is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 12, 2013 | 0.46 |
The correlation between VGG.TO and ZEB.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.
VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
Technology
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Financial Services
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
Healthcare
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Industrials
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Defensive
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Consumer Cyclical
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Energy
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Basic Materials
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Utilities
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Communication Services
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
-
Real Estate
VGG.TO
-
ZEB.TO
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VGG.TO
ZEB.TO
VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| VGG.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.99 | -0.63 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.97 | 8.09 | -5.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.06 | 34.80 | -23.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, smaller than the maximum ZEB.TO drawdown of -39.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and ZEB.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGG.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.58% | -39.69% | +15.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -8.44% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -14.80% | -0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -25.97% | +7.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.58% | -39.69% | +15.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -5.65% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 1.96% | -0.06% |
Volatility
VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) is 3.08%, while BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF (ZEB.TO) has a volatility of 4.52%. This indicates that VGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGG.TO | ZEB.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.08% | 4.52% | -1.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.03% | 11.13% | -3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.34% | 12.81% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 13.55% | -0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.99% | 16.90% | -1.91% |
VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGG.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ZEB.TO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGG.TO vs. ZEB.TO - Dividend Comparison
VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than ZEB.TO's 2.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.01% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.45% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
ZEB.TO BMO Equal Weight Banks Index ETF | 2.41% | 2.95% | 3.98% | 4.75% | 4.29% | 3.13% | 4.15% | 3.65% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.19% | 3.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGG.TO and ZEB.TO have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZEB.TO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZEB.TO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGG.TO.
VGG.TO is categorized as Dividend, while ZEB.TO is Financials Equities. VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while ZEB.TO tracks Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGG.TO and 0.25% for ZEB.TO.
Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and ZEB.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer