VGG.TO vs. ZDIV.TO
VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) and ZDIV.TO (BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF) are both Dividend funds - VGG.TO tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index while ZDIV.TO tracks the MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Select Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGG.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ZDIV.TO.
Performance
VGG.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
ZDIV.TO
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VGG.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 4.66% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 15.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGG.TO and ZDIV.TO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2026 | 0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGG.TO vs. ZDIV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VGG.TO
ZDIV.TO
VGG.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF (ZDIV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGG.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGG.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 5.66 | -4.68 |
Drawdowns
VGG.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, which is greater than ZDIV.TO's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and ZDIV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGG.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.58% | -2.60% | -21.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.58% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.02% | +1.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -0.49% | -2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | — | — |
Volatility
VGG.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGG.TO | ZDIV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 9.99% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 9.99% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 9.99% | +4.98% |
VGG.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGG.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ZDIV.TO's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGG.TO vs. ZDIV.TO - Dividend Comparison
VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, more than ZDIV.TO's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
ZDIV.TO BMO MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Index ETF | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGG.TO and ZDIV.TO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ZDIV.TO is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ZDIV.TO is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for VGG.TO.
VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while ZDIV.TO tracks MSCI Canada IMI High Dividend Yield Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGG.TO and 0.09% for ZDIV.TO.
Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and ZDIV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer