VGG.TO vs. ZCM.TO
VGG.TO (Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF) and ZCM.TO (BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - VGG.TO is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while ZCM.TO is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the FTSE Canada Mid Term Corporate Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, VGG.TO returned 13.46%/yr vs 3.01%/yr for ZCM.TO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. VGG.TO charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for ZCM.TO.
Performance
VGG.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VGG.TO achieves a 8.57% return, which is significantly higher than ZCM.TO's 1.96% return. Over the past 10 years, VGG.TO has outperformed ZCM.TO with an annualized return of 13.46%, while ZCM.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 3.01% annualized return.
VGG.TO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 6.30%
- 1Y
- 20.66%
- 3Y*
- 17.22%
- 5Y*
- 13.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.46%
ZCM.TO
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 5.13%
- 3Y*
- 6.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 3.01%
VGG.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 8.57% | 8.61% | 26.49% | 11.58% | -4.21% | 22.23% | 12.67% | 23.32% | 5.20% | 13.99% |
ZCM.TO BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF | 1.96% | 4.84% | 8.07% | 7.96% | -10.18% | -2.09% | 10.34% | 8.59% | 0.58% | 2.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between VGG.TO and ZCM.TO is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2013 | 0.08 |
Over the past year, VGG.TO and ZCM.TO have become more correlated (0.29) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VGG.TO vs. ZCM.TO — Risk / Return Rank
VGG.TO
ZCM.TO
VGG.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) and BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VGG.TO | ZCM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.21 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.94 | 1.67 | +1.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.93 | 4.77 | +6.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VGG.TO | ZCM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.03 | 1.14 | +0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.05 | 0.38 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | 0.35 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.98 | 0.56 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
VGG.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -24.58%, smaller than the maximum ZCM.TO drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VGG.TO and ZCM.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VGG.TO | ZCM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.58% | -26.06% | +1.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.07% | -3.08% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.56% | -4.02% | -11.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.52% | -15.82% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.58% | -26.06% | +1.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.37% | +0.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.93% | -2.61% | -0.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.89% | 1.08% | +0.81% |
Volatility
VGG.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF (VGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.59% compared to BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF (ZCM.TO) at 1.81%. This indicates that VGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZCM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VGG.TO | ZCM.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 1.81% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.86% | 3.65% | +4.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.23% | 4.51% | +5.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.63% | 6.09% | +6.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 8.76% | +6.21% |
VGG.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
VGG.TO has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ZCM.TO's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
VGG.TO vs. ZCM.TO - Dividend Comparison
VGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than ZCM.TO's 4.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
VGG.TO Vanguard U.S. Dividend Appreciation Index ETF | 1.02% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.37% | 1.35% | 1.21% | 1.25% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.46% | 1.63% | 1.70% |
ZCM.TO BMO Mid Corporate Bond Index ETF | 4.25% | 4.03% | 3.84% | 3.93% | 3.80% | 3.29% | 3.12% | 3.33% | 3.22% | 3.04% | 3.18% | 3.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VGG.TO and ZCM.TO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGG.TO is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGG.TO is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for ZCM.TO.
VGG.TO is categorized as Dividend, while ZCM.TO is Corporate Bonds. VGG.TO tracks S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, while ZCM.TO tracks FTSE Canada Mid Term Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Vanguard and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for VGG.TO and 0.33% for ZCM.TO.
Find the right allocation for VGG.TO and ZCM.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer